Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarking And DagenhamLongbridge ward16/00916/PRIOR6
Planning application · Barking And Dagenham

16/00916/PRIOR6.

70 Hurstbourne Gardens, Barking, Barking And Dagenham, IG11 9UT

Prior Approval: Larger Home Extension at 70 Hurstbourne Gardens, Barking, Barking And Dagenham, IG11 9UT, received 14 Jun 2016 — refused on 21 Jul 2016 (delegated, Jonathan Ryan).

Barking And DagenhamLongbridgeIG11 9UT16/00916/PRIOR6
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarking And Dagenham profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 Jul 2016
5 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barking And Dagenham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Application for prior approval of proposed single storey rear extension (depth: 6.0 metres and maximum height: 3.0 metres).

Reference
16/00916/PRIOR6
Type
Prior Approval: Larger Home Extension
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG11 9UT
Received
14 Jun 2016
Target date
25 Jul 2016
Decision date
21 Jul 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
16/00916/PRIOR6
Type
Prior Approval: Larger Home Extension
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG11 9UT
Received
14 Jun 2016
Target date
25 Jul 2016
Decision date
21 Jul 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Barking And Dagenham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 21 Jul 2016, delegated decision by Jonathan Ryan — 5 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Jun 2016
Application received
25 Jul 2016
Statutory target date
21 Jul 2016
Delegated decision: Refused · Jonathan Ryan
14 Jun 2016
Application received
25 Jul 2016
Statutory target date
21 Jul 2016
Delegated decision: Refused · Jonathan Ryan

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.