Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarking And DagenhamEastbury ward16/01309/FUL
Planning application · Barking And Dagenham

16/01309/FUL.

476 Ripple Road, Barking, Barking And Dagenham, IG11 9RY

Full Planning Permission at 476 Ripple Road, Barking, Barking And Dagenham, IG11 9RY, received 18 Aug 2016 — refused on 3 Nov 2016 (delegated, Jonathan Ryan).

Barking And DagenhamEastburyIG11 9RY16/01309/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarking And Dagenham profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Nov 2016
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barking And Dagenham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of two storey 2 bedroom detached house.

Reference
16/01309/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG11 9RY
Received
18 Aug 2016
Validated
19 Aug 2016
Target date
3 Nov 2016
Decision date
3 Nov 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
16/01309/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG11 9RY
Received
18 Aug 2016
Validated
19 Aug 2016
Target date
3 Nov 2016
Decision date
3 Nov 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Barking And Dagenham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 Nov 2016, delegated decision by Jonathan Ryan — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Aug 2016
Application received
19 Aug 2016
Application validated
3 Nov 2016
Statutory target date
3 Nov 2016
Delegated decision: Refused · Jonathan Ryan
18 Aug 2016
Application received
19 Aug 2016
Application validated
3 Nov 2016
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 Nov 2016
Delegated decision: Refused · Jonathan Ryan

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.