Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarking And DagenhamWhalebone ward16/01503/FUL
Planning application · Barking And Dagenham

16/01503/FUL.

37 Gordon Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, Barking And Dagenham, RM6 6DD

Full Planning Permission at 37 Gordon Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, Barking And Dagenham, RM6 6DD, received 26 Sep 2016 — refused on 8 Mar 2017 by committee.

Barking And DagenhamWhaleboneRM6 6DD16/01503/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarking And Dagenham profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Mar 2017
23 wks
Decision time
15 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barking And Dagenham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of bungalow and erection of 3 two storey two bedroom dwellings.

Reference
16/01503/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM6 6DD
Received
26 Sep 2016
Validated
30 Sep 2016
Target date
8 Mar 2017
Decision date
8 Mar 2017
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
16/01503/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM6 6DD
Received
26 Sep 2016
Validated
30 Sep 2016
Target date
8 Mar 2017
Decision date
8 Mar 2017
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Barking And Dagenham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 8 Mar 2017, determined by the planning committee — 23 weeks from submission (15 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Sep 2016
Application received
30 Sep 2016
Application validated
8 Mar 2017
Statutory target date
8 Mar 2017
Committee decision: Refused
26 Sep 2016
Application received
30 Sep 2016
Application validated
8 Mar 2017
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
8 Mar 2017
Committee decision: Refused

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer (report to committee)
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.