Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarking And DagenhamAlibon ward16/01684/CLU_P
Planning application · Barking And Dagenham

16/01684/CLU_P.

378 Heathway, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM10 8NS

Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed Use) at 378 Heathway, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM10 8NS, received 28 Oct 2016 — refused on 23 Dec 2016 (delegated, Jonathan Ryan).

Barking And DagenhamAlibonRM10 8NS16/01684/CLU_P
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarking And Dagenham profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Dec 2016
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barking And Dagenham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Application for a certificate of lawfulness for a proposed development: Loft conversion involving construction of gable end roof, rear dormer window and front rooflights.

Reference
16/01684/CLU_P
Type
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed Use)
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM10 8NS
Ward
Received
28 Oct 2016
Validated
31 Oct 2016
Target date
26 Dec 2016
Decision date
23 Dec 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
16/01684/CLU_P
Type
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed Use)
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM10 8NS
Ward
Received
28 Oct 2016
Validated
31 Oct 2016
Target date
26 Dec 2016
Decision date
23 Dec 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Barking And Dagenham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 23 Dec 2016, delegated decision by Jonathan Ryan — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Oct 2016
Application received
31 Oct 2016
Application validated
26 Dec 2016
Statutory target date
23 Dec 2016
Delegated decision: Refused · Jonathan Ryan
28 Oct 2016
Application received
31 Oct 2016
Application validated
26 Dec 2016
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
23 Dec 2016
Delegated decision: Refused · Jonathan Ryan

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.