Planning application · Barking And Dagenham
20/00438/FUL.
88 Monmouth Road, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM9 5DB
Full / Other Planning at 88 Monmouth Road, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM9 5DB, received 24 Mar 2020 — refused on 5 May 2020 (delegated, Kathryn McAllister).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarking And Dagenham profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 May 2020
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barking And Dagenham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of existing garage and small rear extension and erection of a single storey rear extension; two storey side extension and loft conversion involving the construction of a rear dormer window and hip to gable.
Reference
20/00438/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM9 5DB
Ward
Council
Received
24 Mar 2020
Validated
25 Mar 2020
Target date
20 May 2020
Decision date
5 May 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
20/00438/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM9 5DB
Ward
Council
Received
24 Mar 2020
Validated
25 Mar 2020
Target date
20 May 2020
Decision date
5 May 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Barking And Dagenham portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 5 May 2020, delegated decision by Kathryn McAllister — 6 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
24 Mar 2020
Application received
25 Mar 2020
Application validated
20 May 2020
Statutory target date
5 May 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Kathryn McAllister
24 Mar 2020
Application received
25 Mar 2020
Application validated
20 May 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 May 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Kathryn McAllister
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed two storey side extension with flat roof and hip to gable loft conversion with
a rear dormer window by reason of its design and sitting would result in an unsympathetic,
unbalancing and uncharacteristic addition to the dwellinghouse. The proposed two storey
side extension with flat roof and hip to gable loft conversion with a rear dormer window
would result in the harmful erosion of the character and appearance of the host property
on this corner location and the wider terrace. As such, the proposed development is
contrary to;
• National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, February 2019)
• Policies 7.4 and 7.6 of The London Plan (March 2016)
• Policies D4 of the Draft London Plan Intended to Publish (December 2019)
• Policy BP8 and BP11 of the Borough Wide DPD (March 2011)
• Policies DM16 of the Draft Local Plan Regulation 18 consultation version (November
2019)
The above policies can be viewed on the Council's website: www.lbbd.gov.uk/planning
1
The proposed two storey side extension with flat roof and hip to gable loft conversion with
a rear dormer window by reason of its design and sitting would result in an unsympathetic,
unbalancing and uncharacteristic addition to the dwellinghouse. The proposed two storey
side extension with flat roof and hip to gable loft conversion with a rear dormer window
would result in the harmful erosion of the character and appearance of the host property
on this corner location and the wider terrace. As such, the proposed development is
contrary to;
• National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, February 2019)
• Policies 7.4 and 7.6 of The London Plan (March 2016)
• Policies D4 of the Draft London Plan Intended to Publish (December 2019)
• Policy BP8 and BP11 of the Borough Wide DPD (March 2011)
• Policies DM16 of the Draft Local Plan Regulation 18 consultation version (November
2019)
The above policies can be viewed on the Council's website: www.lbbd.gov.uk/planning
Policies cited
London Plan 7.4London Plan 7.6D4BP8BP11DM16NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.