Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarking And DagenhamEastbury ward21/01308/HSE
Planning application · Barking And Dagenham

21/01308/HSE.

235 Sheppey Road, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM9 4JT

Householder at 235 Sheppey Road, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM9 4JT, received 10 Jul 2021 — refused on 26 Aug 2021 (delegated, Orla Bermingham).

Barking And DagenhamEastburyRM9 4JT21/01308/HSE
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarking And Dagenham profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Aug 2021
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barking And Dagenham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of a single storey rear and part side extension with a flat roof and skylight

Reference
21/01308/HSE
Type
Householder Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
RM9 4JT
Received
10 Jul 2021
Validated
20 Jul 2021
Target date
14 Sep 2021
Decision date
26 Aug 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
21/01308/HSE
Type
Householder Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Case officer
Postcode
RM9 4JT
Received
10 Jul 2021
Validated
20 Jul 2021
Target date
14 Sep 2021
Decision date
26 Aug 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
20 Aug 2021
Proposed Block Plan
16 Aug 2021
Existing block plan
16 Aug 2021
Officer Report
10 Aug 2021
Application Form Redacted
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 10
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 9
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 8
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 7
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 6
13 Jul 2021
Decision Notice
20 Aug 2021
Proposed Block Plan
16 Aug 2021
Existing block plan
16 Aug 2021
Show all 10 rows
Officer Report
10 Aug 2021
Application Form Redacted
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 10
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 9
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 8
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 7
13 Jul 2021
Site Photograph 6
13 Jul 2021

Documents open on the Barking And Dagenham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Aug 2021, delegated decision by Orla Bermingham — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
10 Jul 2021
Application received
20 Jul 2021
Application validated
14 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
26 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Orla Bermingham
10 Jul 2021
Application received
20 Jul 2021
Application validated
14 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Orla Bermingham

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development by reason of its excessive scale and awkward parameters results in a bulky addition which fails to compliment the appearance of the original dwellinghouse and surronding area. This is considered harmful to the appearance of the house, built form of the terrace and character of the area, notably given the location of the application site within the Becontree Estate. As such, the proposed development is contrary to: - National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, February 2019); - Policy D4 of the London Plan (March 2021); - Policies SP2, DMD1, DMD 4 and DMD 6 of the Draft Local Plan (Regulation 19 Consultation Version, October 2020); - Policies CP2 and CP3 of the LDF Core Strategy (July 2010); - Policies BP2, BP8 and BP11 of the LDF Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD (March 2011); - The Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document (February 2012).
2
The scale, siting and design of the proposed development would result in an increased sense of overbearingness and a harmful loss of outlook to no 233 Sheppey Road, therefore constituting unneighbourly development and contrary to: - National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, February 2019); - Policy D4 of the London Plan (March 2021); - Policies SP2, DMD1 and DMD 6 of the Draft Local Plan (Regulation 19 Consultation Version, October 2020); - Policy CP3 of the LDF Core Strategy (July 2010); - Policies BP8 and BP11 of the LDF Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD (March 2011); - The Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document (February 2012). The above policies can be viewed on the Council's website: www.lbbd.gov.uk/planning.
1
The proposed development by reason of its excessive scale and awkward parameters results in a bulky addition which fails to compliment the appearance of the original dwellinghouse and surronding area. This is considered harmful to the appearance of the house, built form of the terrace and character of the area, notably given the location of the application site within the Becontree Estate. As such, the proposed development is contrary to: - National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, February 2019); - Policy D4 of the London Plan (March 2021); - Policies SP2, DMD1, DMD 4 and DMD 6 of the Draft Local Plan (Regulation 19 Consultation Version, October 2020); - Policies CP2 and CP3 of the LDF Core Strategy (July 2010); - Policies BP2, BP8 and BP11 of the LDF Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD (March 2011); - The Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document (February 2012).
2
The scale, siting and design of the proposed development would result in an increased sense of overbearingness and a harmful loss of outlook to no 233 Sheppey Road, therefore constituting unneighbourly development and contrary to: - National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, February 2019); - Policy D4 of the London Plan (March 2021); - Policies SP2, DMD1 and DMD 6 of the Draft Local Plan (Regulation 19 Consultation Version, October 2020); - Policy CP3 of the LDF Core Strategy (July 2010); - Policies BP8 and BP11 of the LDF Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD (March 2011); - The Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document (February 2012). The above policies can be viewed on the Council's website: www.lbbd.gov.uk/planning.
Policies cited
D4SP2DMD1DMD4DMD6CP2CP3BP2BP8BP11NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.