Planning application · Barking And Dagenham
22/01197/FULL.
Dhl, Shed A, BARKING LOGISTICS CENTRE Box Lane, Barking, Barking And Dagenham, IG11 0SQ
Full / Other Planning at Dhl, Shed A, BARKING LOGISTICS CENTRE Box Lane, Barking, Barking And Dagenham, IG11 0SQ, received 30 Jun 2022 — refused on 4 Oct 2024 (delegated, Kathryn McAllister).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarking And Dagenham profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Oct 2024
118 wks
Decision time
110 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
32
Documents
32 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barking And Dagenham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Change of use from industrial warehouse to a waste processing facility.
Reference
22/01197/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG11 0SQ
Council
Received
30 Jun 2022
Validated
6 Jul 2022
Target date
1 Nov 2024
Decision date
4 Oct 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
22/01197/FULL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
IG11 0SQ
Council
Received
30 Jun 2022
Validated
6 Jul 2022
Target date
1 Nov 2024
Decision date
4 Oct 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Barking And Dagenham portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 4 Oct 2024, delegated decision by Kathryn McAllister — 118 weeks from submission (110 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
30 Jun 2022
Application received
6 Jul 2022
Application validated
1 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
4 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Kathryn McAllister
30 Jun 2022
Application received
6 Jul 2022
Application validated
1 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Kathryn McAllister
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
In the absence of a s106 agreement or other method to secure employment and skills
opportunities for residents of the borough the development fails to support business growth,
employment, skills development or employment and training opportunities contrary to:
Policies E8, E11 and SD1 of the London Plan (March 2021)
Policy SP5 of The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan
2
In the absence of a s106 agreement or other method to secure a Travel Plan and Minibus
Services the development fails to promote the use of sustainable modes of transport harmful to
public health and the transport network. The proposal is contrary to:-
Policy T4 of the London Plan (March 2021)
Policy DMT1 The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan
3
In the absence of a s106 agreement or other methods to secure the long-term use of the railway
to move waste recycled at the site and without the submission of satisfactory evidence to support
the use of alternative means of transport the development fails to demonstrate it will be air quality
neutral contrary to:
Policy SI1 of the London Plan (March 2021)
Policies SP7 and DMSI4 The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan
(September 2024).
4
In the absence of a s106 agreement or other method to secure a minimum onsite carbon
emission reduction of 36.19%, carbon financial contribution, Be Seen Carbon Monitoring and
monitoring fees to cover the cost of reviews the development fails to demonstrate it will achieve
zero-carbon targets and support the delivery of a low carbon future contrary to:
Policy SI2 of the London Plan (March 2021)
Policy DMSI2 of The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan
The above policies can be viewed on the Council's website: www.lbbd.gov.uk/planning.
Working with the applicant:
In dealing with this application, Be First, working in partnership with the London Borough of
Barking and Dagenham, has implemented the requirements of the National Planning Policy
Framework and the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England)
Order 2015 to work with the applicant in a
1
In the absence of a s106 agreement or other method to secure employment and skills
opportunities for residents of the borough the development fails to support business growth,
employment, skills development or employment and training opportunities contrary to:
Policies E8, E11 and SD1 of the London Plan (March 2021)
Policy SP5 of The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan
2
In the absence of a s106 agreement or other method to secure a Travel Plan and Minibus
Services the development fails to promote the use of sustainable modes of transport harmful to
public health and the transport network. The proposal is contrary to:-
Policy T4 of the London Plan (March 2021)
Policy DMT1 The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan
3
In the absence of a s106 agreement or other methods to secure the long-term use of the railway
to move waste recycled at the site and without the submission of satisfactory evidence to support
the use of alternative means of transport the development fails to demonstrate it will be air quality
neutral contrary to:
Policy SI1 of the London Plan (March 2021)
Policies SP7 and DMSI4 The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan
(September 2024).
Show all 4 rows
4
In the absence of a s106 agreement or other method to secure a minimum onsite carbon
emission reduction of 36.19%, carbon financial contribution, Be Seen Carbon Monitoring and
monitoring fees to cover the cost of reviews the development fails to demonstrate it will achieve
zero-carbon targets and support the delivery of a low carbon future contrary to:
Policy SI2 of the London Plan (March 2021)
Policy DMSI2 of The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan
The above policies can be viewed on the Council's website: www.lbbd.gov.uk/planning.
Working with the applicant:
In dealing with this application, Be First, working in partnership with the London Borough of
Barking and Dagenham, has implemented the requirements of the National Planning Policy
Framework and the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England)
Order 2015 to work with the applicant in a
Policies cited
E8E11SD1T4SI1SI2NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.