Planning Atlas
AtlasBarking and DagenhamOfficersThomas Faherty
Case officer · Barking And Dagenham Planning

Thomas Faherty.

Last recorded decision Jun 2018 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Barking And Dagenham with an approval rate of 73% across 140 decided planning applications, spanning 17 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer140 decisions73% approval
Wards shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
Showing
All years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
140
Applications
2017–18
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 79%82%201772%2018
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate73% · 53rd of 78
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Thomas Faherty's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most across their decisions — how often each appears, and whether refusals citing it survive appeal.

In development — policy citations are coded from officer reports, and that parsing hasn't run for Barking And Dagenham yet. Nothing is shown until it is real.

Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
12
75%
Show all 17 rows
10
80%
9
67%
7
43%
5
100%
4
50%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2017–18.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
18/01009/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2018-08-06
18/00952/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2018-07-31
18/01009/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2018-08-06
18/00952/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2018-07-31
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 140 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Cityscape Planning & Architecture Ltd
2. Stylish Interiors & Architecture
3. Civils Consulting Ltd
4. Tech Engineering (UK) Ltd
At a glance
OfficerThomas Faherty
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications140 (2017–18)
Approval rate73%
London approval avg79%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Barking And Dagenham planning register and published decision notices, 2017–18. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Barking And Dagenham decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.