Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Bexley›…ST.MARY'S (HISTORIC 2018) ward›02/00097/FUL
Planning application · Bexley

02/00097/FUL.

433 Hurst Road Bexley Kent DA5 3LG

Full / Other Planning at 433 Hurst Road Bexley Kent DA5 3LG, received 8 Jan 2002 — withdrawn on 26 Feb 2002 (delegated, D M Smith).

Bexley›ST.MARY'S (HISTORIC 2018)›DA5 3LG›02/00097/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBexley profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
26 Feb 2002
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Bexley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Part one/part two storey rear extension. Formation of pitched roof to existing extension.

Reference
02/00097/FUL
Type
Detailed Planning Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
DA5 3LG
Ward
Council
Received
8 Jan 2002
Target date
5 Mar 2002
Decision date
26 Feb 2002
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Withdrawn
Council register
Reference
02/00097/FUL
Type
Detailed Planning Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
DA5 3LG
Ward
Council
Received
8 Jan 2002
Target date
5 Mar 2002
Decision date
26 Feb 2002
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Withdrawn
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Planning Drawing
16 Apr 2007
Planning Drawing
16 Apr 2007

Documents open on the Bexley portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 26 Feb 2002, delegated decision by D M Smith — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Jan 2002
Application received
5 Mar 2002
Statutory target date
26 Feb 2002
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · D M Smith
8 Jan 2002
Application received
5 Mar 2002
Statutory target date
26 Feb 2002
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · D M Smith

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.