Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBexleyCRAY MEADOWS (HISTORIC 2018) ward02/00720/FUL
Planning application · Bexley

02/00720/FUL.

82 And 92 And Land Rear Of 80-94 St. James Way Sidcup Kent

Full / Other Planning at 82 And 92 And Land Rear Of 80-94 St. James Way Sidcup Kent, received 28 Feb 2002 — refused on 6 Jun 2002 by committee.

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationBexley profile →
Refused
Outcome
6 Jun 2002
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Bexley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of 4 storage containers for use by Crystal Cleaning Supplies

Reference
02/00720/FUL
Type
Detailed Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
28 Feb 2002
Validated
11 Apr 2002
Target date
6 Jun 2002
Decision date
6 Jun 2002
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Reference
02/00720/FUL
Type
Detailed Planning Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
28 Feb 2002
Validated
11 Apr 2002
Target date
6 Jun 2002
Decision date
6 Jun 2002
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Planning Decision Notice
8 Oct 2009
Site Plan
8 Oct 2009
Planning Decision Notice
8 Oct 2009
Site Plan
8 Oct 2009

Documents open on the Bexley portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 6 Jun 2002, determined by the planning committee — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Feb 2002
Application received
11 Apr 2002
Application validated
6 Jun 2002
Statutory target date
6 Jun 2002
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
28 Feb 2002
Application received
11 Apr 2002
Application validated
6 Jun 2002
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
6 Jun 2002
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.