Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Bexley›…BLENDON & PENHILL (HISTORIC 2018) wardDA15 9PF72A Park Mead Sidcup Kent DA15 9PF›06/01080/FUL
Planning application · Bexley

06/01080/FUL.

72A Park Mead Sidcup Kent DA15 9PF

Full / Other Planning at 72A Park Mead Sidcup Kent DA15 9PF, received 16 Mar 2006 — refused on 11 May 2006 (delegated, D Di Renzo).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBexley profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 May 2006
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
—
Objections
0 comments
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Bexley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Alteration to roofline to provide rooms in roofspace incorporating a rear dormer extension.

Reference
06/01080/FUL
Type
Detailed Planning Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
16 Mar 2006
Decision date
11 May 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
06/01080/FUL
Type
Detailed Planning Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
16 Mar 2006
Decision date
11 May 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Added for DMS planning transfer
10 Oct 2013
Added for DMS planning transfer
10 Oct 2013
Added for DMS planning transfer
10 Oct 2013
Planning Decision FUL Refused
11 May 2006
Site Plan
23 Mar 2006
Added for DMS planning transfer
10 Oct 2013
Added for DMS planning transfer
10 Oct 2013
Added for DMS planning transfer
10 Oct 2013
Show all 5 rows
Planning Decision FUL Refused
11 May 2006
Site Plan
23 Mar 2006

Documents open on the Bexley portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 11 May 2006, delegated decision by D Di Renzo — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
16 Mar 2006
Application received
11 May 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · D Di Renzo
16 Mar 2006
Application received
11 May 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · D Di Renzo

Public response

Measure
Count
Total comments
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.