Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBexleyST MARYS & ST JAMES ward15/02992/FUL
Planning application · Bexley

15/02992/FUL.

Stuart Nurseries 57 North Cray Road Sidcup Kent DA14 5EU

Full / Other Planning at Stuart Nurseries 57 North Cray Road Sidcup Kent DA14 5EU, received 22 Oct 2021 — withdrawn on 22 Oct 2021 (delegated, David Bloom).

BexleyST MARYS & ST JAMESDA14 5EU15/02992/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBexley profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
22 Oct 2021
0 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
205
Documents
200 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Bexley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Planning Enforcement Notice Appeal 15/00069/ENF Stuarts Nurseries. Without planning permission, the development of: The Land from a use in part for a shared highway access, carpark and accessway related to and for a part geographically identified in Certificate 09.00091.LDCE, for the lawful use for screening of soil, manure and soil storage, and part undeveloped land of nil use, to an unlawful use comprising: a use for the deposit, crushing and processing of inert waste (waste code 17 09 04 as defined in Schedule 2.1 of the Environment Agencys variation of the permit attached as Appendix 1 to this Notice); a use for the deposit, processing and storage of soil within the hatched area on the P

Reference
15/02992/FUL
Type
Detailed Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
DA14 5EU
Council
Received
22 Oct 2021
Decision date
22 Oct 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Withdrawn
Reference
15/02992/FUL
Type
Detailed Planning Application
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
DA14 5EU
Council
Received
22 Oct 2021
Decision date
22 Oct 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Withdrawn
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
LB BEXLEY RESPONSE TO APPELLANT COSTS APPLICATION - 13 JAN 2
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX A TO LPA RESPONSE TO APP COSTS APPLICATION - APPELL
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX B - SCANNED-DAVID.BLOOM-20210903094122.PDF
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX C 12.02.2021 EMAIL TO PINS APPENDIX M & N & PCN RES
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX C 16.02.2021 EMAIL TO PINS APPENDIX M, N & Z SENT T
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX C18.02.2021 EMAIL FROM PINS APPELLANTS STATEMENT OF
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX C 23.02.2021 EMAIL TO PINS APPENDIX Z.PDF
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX C 13.07.2021 LETTER MARK JONES.PDF
13 Jan 2022
LETTER TO BEXLEY 14.07.21.PDF
12 Jan 2022
21.09.2021 57 NORTH CRAY ROAD.PDF
12 Jan 2022
LB BEXLEY RESPONSE TO APPELLANT COSTS APPLICATION - 13 JAN 2
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX A TO LPA RESPONSE TO APP COSTS APPLICATION - APPELL
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX B - SCANNED-DAVID.BLOOM-20210903094122.PDF
13 Jan 2022
Show all 10 rows
APPENDIX C 12.02.2021 EMAIL TO PINS APPENDIX M & N & PCN RES
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX C 16.02.2021 EMAIL TO PINS APPENDIX M, N & Z SENT T
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX C18.02.2021 EMAIL FROM PINS APPELLANTS STATEMENT OF
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX C 23.02.2021 EMAIL TO PINS APPENDIX Z.PDF
13 Jan 2022
APPENDIX C 13.07.2021 LETTER MARK JONES.PDF
13 Jan 2022
LETTER TO BEXLEY 14.07.21.PDF
12 Jan 2022
21.09.2021 57 NORTH CRAY ROAD.PDF
12 Jan 2022

205 documents on the council file; the first 200 are listed here.

Documents open on the Bexley portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 22 Oct 2021, delegated decision by David Bloom — 0 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Oct 2021
Application received
22 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · David Bloom
22 Oct 2021
Application received
22 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · David Bloom

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.