Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBexleySIDCUP ward19/02085/FULM
Planning application · Bexley

19/02085/FULM.

Lidl 23 Foots Cray High Street Sidcup Kent DA14 5HJ

Details pursuant to Planning Condition at Lidl 23 Foots Cray High Street Sidcup Kent DA14 5HJ, received 11 May 2022 — refused on 7 Jul 2020 by committee.

BexleySIDCUPDA14 5HJ19/02085/FULM
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBexley profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 Jul 2020
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
4
Objections
not captured
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Allowed with conditions
Record from the Bexley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Details of conditions 20 (travel plan) pursuant to planning permission 19/02085/FULM allowed on appeal for the demolition of the existing buildings and erection of a new retail store (Class A1) with Offices (Class B1a) and 5 x 3 bed terraced houses with provision of parking spaces.

Reference
19/02085/FULM
Type
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
DA14 5HJ
Ward
Council
Received
11 May 2022
Validated
11 May 2022
Target date
9 Dec 2019
Decision date
7 Jul 2020
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Reference
19/02085/FULM
Type
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
DA14 5HJ
Ward
Council
Received
11 May 2022
Validated
11 May 2022
Target date
9 Dec 2019
Decision date
7 Jul 2020
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Bexley portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 7 Jul 2020, determined by the planning committee.

Timeline

Date
Event
11 May 2022
Application received
11 May 2022
Application validated
9 Dec 2019
Statutory target date
7 Jul 2020
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal Allowed · Appeal Allowed with conditions
11 May 2022
Application received
11 May 2022
Application validated
9 Dec 2019
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
7 Jul 2020
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal Allowed · Appeal Allowed with conditions

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Allowed
Outcome: Appeal Allowed with conditions
Appeal Allowed
Outcome: Appeal Allowed with conditions

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
4
Objections
4
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.