Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBexleySIDCUP ward20/01728/T
Planning application · Bexley

20/01728/T.

1 Elm Road Sidcup Kent DA14 6AF

Trees at 1 Elm Road Sidcup Kent DA14 6AF, received 15 Jul 2020 — approved on 18 Sep 2020 by committee.

BexleySIDCUPDA14 6AF20/01728/T
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBexley profile →
Approved
Outcome
18 Sep 2020
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Bexley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Works to a Holm Oak tree subject to a Tree Preservation Order.

Reference
20/01728/T
Type
Works to Trees under Tree Preservation
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
DA14 6AF
Ward
Council
Received
15 Jul 2020
Target date
9 Sep 2020
Decision date
18 Sep 2020
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Granted with Conditions
Reference
20/01728/T
Type
Works to Trees under Tree Preservation
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
DA14 6AF
Ward
Council
Received
15 Jul 2020
Target date
9 Sep 2020
Decision date
18 Sep 2020
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Granted with Conditions
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
PETZ
18 Sept 2020
Application Form - Public
15 Jul 2020
TREE LOCATION PLAN
15 Jul 2020
PETZ
18 Sept 2020
Application Form - Public
15 Jul 2020
TREE LOCATION PLAN
15 Jul 2020

Documents open on the Bexley portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 18 Sep 2020, determined by the planning committee — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Jul 2020
Application received
9 Sep 2020
Statutory target date
18 Sep 2020
Committee decision: Approved
15 Jul 2020
Application received
9 Sep 2020
Statutory target date
18 Sep 2020
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.