Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBexleyBELVEDERE ward22/00525/FULM
Planning application · Bexley

22/00525/FULM.

Sikh Temple 31 Mitchell Close Belvedere Kent DA17 6AA

Full / Other Planning at Sikh Temple 31 Mitchell Close Belvedere Kent DA17 6AA, received 2 Mar 2022 — approved on 19 May 2023.

BexleyBELVEDEREDA17 6AA22/00525/FULM
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBexley profile →
Approved
Outcome
19 May 2023
63 wks
Decision time
55 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
30
Documents
30 linked
2
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Bexley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Application for a minor material amendment to allow for changes to the car parking layout, internal floor levels, reconfiguration of internal layout including the replacement of the mezzanine level with a second floor, elevational appearance including fenestration and removal of vehicular under-pass to parent permission 20/03253/FULM. The parent permission being for the application for a minor material amendment of the elevations and to the car park layout to parent permission 18/00436/FULM. The parent permission being for the demolition of the existing building and erection of a new Gurdwara/Sikh Temple with provision of associated parking and cycle and bin storage areas.

Reference
22/00525/FULM
Type
Major Detailed Planning Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
DA17 6AA
Council
Received
2 Mar 2022
Validated
28 Mar 2022
Target date
27 Jun 2022
Decision date
19 May 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Granted with Conditions
Reference
22/00525/FULM
Type
Major Detailed Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
DA17 6AA
Council
Received
2 Mar 2022
Validated
28 Mar 2022
Target date
27 Jun 2022
Decision date
19 May 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Granted with Conditions
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
PEFULZ
19 May 2023
Officer Report - Public
19 May 2023
UPDATED SECOND FLOOR PLAN
12 Apr 2023
COVERING LETTER DETAILING UPDATES
12 Apr 2023
UPDATED SECOND FLOOR PLAN
30 Mar 2023
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
14 Feb 2023
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
16 Dec 2022
PROPOSED PROPOSED NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS
16 Dec 2022
PROPOSED PROPOSED SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS
16 Dec 2022
LETTER OUTLINING CHANGES UPDATED
16 Dec 2022
PEFULZ
19 May 2023
Officer Report - Public
19 May 2023
UPDATED SECOND FLOOR PLAN
12 Apr 2023
Show all 10 rows
COVERING LETTER DETAILING UPDATES
12 Apr 2023
UPDATED SECOND FLOOR PLAN
30 Mar 2023
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
14 Feb 2023
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
16 Dec 2022
PROPOSED PROPOSED NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS
16 Dec 2022
PROPOSED PROPOSED SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS
16 Dec 2022
LETTER OUTLINING CHANGES UPDATED
16 Dec 2022

Documents open on the Bexley portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 19 May 2023 — 63 weeks from submission (55 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Mar 2022
Application received
28 Mar 2022
Application validated
27 Jun 2022
Statutory target date
19 May 2023
Delegated decision: Approved
2 Mar 2022
Application received
28 Mar 2022
Application validated
27 Jun 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
19 May 2023
Delegated decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.