Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBexleySIDCUP ward22/01638/FULMIN01
Planning application · Bexley

22/01638/FULMIN01.

21 Kimberley Drive Sidcup Kent DA14 4PP

Full / Other Planning at 21 Kimberley Drive Sidcup Kent DA14 4PP, received 12 Sep 2025 — refused on 9 Oct 2025 (delegated, Heather Redfern).

BexleySIDCUPDA14 4PP22/01638/FULMIN01
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBexley profile →
Refused
Outcome
9 Oct 2025
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Bexley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Non material amendment to alter roofline and fenestration of approved application 22/01638/FUL which allowed the 'Single storey side extension, part one/part two storey rear extension and outbuilding at rear garden end.'

Reference
22/01638/FULMIN01
Type
Minor Amendment Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
DA14 4PP
Ward
Council
Received
12 Sep 2025
Target date
10 Oct 2025
Decision date
9 Oct 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
22/01638/FULMIN01
Type
Minor Amendment Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
DA14 4PP
Ward
Council
Received
12 Sep 2025
Target date
10 Oct 2025
Decision date
9 Oct 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Bexley portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 9 Oct 2025, delegated decision by Heather Redfern — 4 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Sep 2025
Application received
10 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
9 Oct 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Heather Redfern
12 Sep 2025
Application received
10 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
9 Oct 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Heather Redfern

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.