Planning application · Bexley
99/02786/ADV.
3-4 Lime Row Erith Kent DA18 4HW
Advertisement at 3-4 Lime Row Erith Kent DA18 4HW, received 10 Nov 1999 — approved on 25 Jan 2000.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBexley profile →
Approved
Outcome
25 Jan 2000
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Bexley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
One non illuminated wall mounted fascia sign
Reference
99/02786/ADV
Type
Advertisement Consent Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
DA18 4HW
Council
Received
10 Nov 1999
Validated
29 Nov 1999
Target date
24 Jan 2000
Decision date
25 Jan 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Granted with Conditions
Council register
Reference
99/02786/ADV
Type
Advertisement Consent Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
DA18 4HW
Council
Received
10 Nov 1999
Validated
29 Nov 1999
Target date
24 Jan 2000
Decision date
25 Jan 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Granted with Conditions
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Documents open on the Bexley portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 25 Jan 2000 — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
10 Nov 1999
Application received
29 Nov 1999
Application validated
24 Jan 2000
Statutory target date
25 Jan 2000
Delegated decision: Approved
10 Nov 1999
Application received
29 Nov 1999
Application validated
24 Jan 2000
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
25 Jan 2000
Delegated decision: Approved
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.