Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Brent›…HA3 0BZ154 Draycott Avenue, Kenton Harrow, HA3 0BZ›00/2799
Planning application · Brent

00/2799.

154 Draycott Avenue, Kenton Harrow, HA3 0BZ

Householder at 154 Draycott Avenue, Kenton Harrow, HA3 0BZ, received 14 Dec 2000 — refused on 1 Feb 2001 (delegated, Tim Rolt).

Brent›HA3 0BZ›00/2799
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Feb 2001
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of extension to roof to form room in loft space, and reduction in width of the rear dormer,

Reference
00/2799
Type
Householder
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
14 Dec 2000
Target date
8 Feb 2001
Decision date
1 Feb 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
00/2799
Type
Householder
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
14 Dec 2000
Target date
8 Feb 2001
Decision date
1 Feb 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal decision
5 Feb 2010
Brent's decision notice
5 Feb 2010
Appeal decision
5 Feb 2010
Brent's decision notice
5 Feb 2010

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 1 Feb 2001, delegated decision by Tim Rolt — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Dec 2000
Application received
8 Feb 2001
Statutory target date
1 Feb 2001
Delegated decision: Refused · Tim Rolt
14 Dec 2000
Application received
8 Feb 2001
Statutory target date
1 Feb 2001
Delegated decision: Refused · Tim Rolt

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.