Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Brent›…53A & 53B, Sellons Avenue, Harlesden, London›01/0845
Planning application · Brent

01/0845.

53A & 53B, Sellons Avenue, Harlesden, London

Householder at 53A & 53B, Sellons Avenue, Harlesden, London, received 29 Mar 2001 — refused on 15 May 2001 (delegated, Rebecca Harfield).

Brent›01/0845
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 May 2001
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of replacement UPVC windows to flats

Reference
01/0845
Type
Householder
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
29 Mar 2001
Target date
24 May 2001
Decision date
15 May 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
01/0845
Type
Householder
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
29 Mar 2001
Target date
24 May 2001
Decision date
15 May 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision
10 Oct 2008
Decision
10 Oct 2008
Decision
10 Oct 2008
Decision
10 Oct 2008
Decision
10 Oct 2008
Decision
10 Oct 2008

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 15 May 2001, delegated decision by Rebecca Harfield — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Mar 2001
Application received
24 May 2001
Statutory target date
15 May 2001
Delegated decision: Refused · Rebecca Harfield
29 Mar 2001
Application received
24 May 2001
Statutory target date
15 May 2001
Delegated decision: Refused · Rebecca Harfield

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.