Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Brent›01/3056
Planning application · Brent

01/3056.

SAINSBURY 1 Nash Way, Kenton Harrow, HA3 0JA

Full / Other Planning at SAINSBURY 1 Nash Way, Kenton Harrow, HA3 0JA, received 24 Dec 2001 — approved on 25 Apr 2002 by committee.

Brent›HA3 0JA›01/3056
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Approved
Outcome
25 Apr 2002
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of additional plant, air-handling unit, new louvres and relocated compactor to be located in the service yard

Reference
01/3056
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 0JA
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
24 Dec 2001
Target date
18 Feb 2002
Decision date
25 Apr 2002
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
01/3056
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 0JA
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
24 Dec 2001
Target date
18 Feb 2002
Decision date
25 Apr 2002
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 25 Apr 2002, determined by the planning committee — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Dec 2001
Application received
18 Feb 2002
Statutory target date
25 Apr 2002
Committee decision: Approved
24 Dec 2001
Application received
18 Feb 2002
Statutory target date
25 Apr 2002
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.