Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Brent›…Fryent - WARD NO LONGER EXISTS wardNW9 9EDBI RITE 495 Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9ED›02/2064
Planning application · Brent

02/2064.

BI RITE 495 Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9ED

Lawful Development Certificate at BI RITE 495 Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9ED, received 19 Aug 2002 — refused on 3 Sep 2002 (delegated, Nick Finney).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Sep 2002
2 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed private vehicle-hire use

Reference
02/2064
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
19 Aug 2002
Target date
13 Oct 2002
Decision date
3 Sep 2002
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
02/2064
Type
Certificate of Lawfulness - Proposed
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
19 Aug 2002
Target date
13 Oct 2002
Decision date
3 Sep 2002
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision
8 Sept 2008
Decision
8 Sept 2008
Decision
8 Sept 2008
Decision
8 Sept 2008
Decision
8 Sept 2008
Decision
8 Sept 2008
Decision
8 Sept 2008
Show all 4 rows
Decision
8 Sept 2008

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 Sep 2002, delegated decision by Nick Finney — 2 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Aug 2002
Application received
13 Oct 2002
Statutory target date
3 Sep 2002
Delegated decision: Refused · Nick Finney
19 Aug 2002
Application received
13 Oct 2002
Statutory target date
3 Sep 2002
Delegated decision: Refused · Nick Finney

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.