Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentWelsh Harp wardNW10 0DP80A Braemar Avenue, London, NW10 0DP03/3402
Planning application · Brent

03/3402.

80A Braemar Avenue, London, NW10 0DP

Householder at 80A Braemar Avenue, London, NW10 0DP, received 4 Dec 2003 — approved on 28 Jan 2004 (delegated, Jane Jin).

BrentWelsh HarpNW10 0DP03/3402
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Approved
Outcome
28 Jan 2004
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of single-storey rear conservatory to first-floor flat

Reference
03/3402
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
4 Dec 2003
Target date
28 Jan 2004
Decision date
28 Jan 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
03/3402
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
4 Dec 2003
Target date
28 Jan 2004
Decision date
28 Jan 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Approved
3 Mar 2005
Delegated report
3 Mar 2005
Delegated report
3 Mar 2005
Approved - proposed conservatory
31 Jan 2005
Approved
3 Mar 2005
Delegated report
3 Mar 2005
Delegated report
3 Mar 2005
Show all 4 rows
Approved - proposed conservatory
31 Jan 2005

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 28 Jan 2004, delegated decision by Jane Jin — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Dec 2003
Application received
28 Jan 2004
Statutory target date
28 Jan 2004
Delegated decision: Approved · Jane Jin
4 Dec 2003
Application received
28 Jan 2004
Statutory target date
28 Jan 2004
Delegated decision: Approved · Jane Jin

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.