Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentStonebridge ward04/1383
Planning application · Brent

04/1383.

0 Craven Road, London, NW10

Other at 0 Craven Road, London, NW10, received 7 May 2004 — refused on 30 Jun 2004 (delegated, Colm McLoughlin).

BrentStonebridge04/1383
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 Jun 2004
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of a 10-metre telegraph pole with integral antennae, 4 equipment cabinets at ground level and associated minor works on land at the junction of Craven Park and Craven Road - opposite El Sub-Station located rear of 24 Craven Park, NW10 (Part 24 General Permitted Development Order 2001)

Reference
04/1383
Type
Other
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
7 May 2004
Target date
1 Jul 2004
Decision date
30 Jun 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
04/1383
Type
Other
Show all 14 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
7 May 2004
Target date
1 Jul 2004
Decision date
30 Jun 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Refused
8 Mar 2005
Delegated report
8 Mar 2005
Refused
8 Mar 2005
Delegated report
8 Mar 2005

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 30 Jun 2004, delegated decision by Colm McLoughlin — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 May 2004
Application received
1 Jul 2004
Statutory target date
30 Jun 2004
Delegated decision: Refused · Colm McLoughlin
7 May 2004
Application received
1 Jul 2004
Statutory target date
30 Jun 2004
Delegated decision: Refused · Colm McLoughlin

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.