Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentWelsh Harp ward06/3014
Planning application · Brent

06/3014.

8 Kinloch Drive, London, NW9 7LG

Householder at 8 Kinloch Drive, London, NW9 7LG, received 21 Dec 2006 — withdrawn on 19 Feb 2007 (delegated, Harini Boteju).

BrentWelsh HarpNW9 7LG06/3014
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
19 Feb 2007
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Hip-to-gable-end roof extension, rear dormer window, extension to front porch and installation of 2 front rooflights to dwellinghouse

Reference
06/3014
Type
Householder
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
NW9 7LG
Council
Received
21 Dec 2006
Target date
14 Feb 2007
Decision date
19 Feb 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
06/3014
Type
Householder
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
NW9 7LG
Council
Received
21 Dec 2006
Target date
14 Feb 2007
Decision date
19 Feb 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Brent's decision notice
23 Feb 2007
Brent's decision notice
23 Feb 2007

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 19 Feb 2007, delegated decision by Harini Boteju — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Dec 2006
Application received
14 Feb 2007
Statutory target date
19 Feb 2007
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Harini Boteju
21 Dec 2006
Application received
14 Feb 2007
Statutory target date
19 Feb 2007
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Harini Boteju

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.