Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentQueens Park ward20/2203
Planning application · Brent

20/2203.

130 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6SB

Full / Other Planning at 130 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6SB, received 24 Jul 2020 — refused on 22 Sep 2020 (delegated, Sarah Dilley).

BrentQueens ParkNW6 6SB20/2203
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 Sep 2020
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
5
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed conversion of property into 6 self-contained flats through excavation of basement extension with creation of front and rear lightwells; three storey rear extension; second floor side extension; roof extension with two front, one rear dormer window; alterations to existing fenestration with replacement of existing timber framed single glazed windows with timber framed double glazed windows; provision of waste storage, car and cycle parking with associated landscaping to existing building

Reference
20/2203
Type
Full Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
NW6 6SB
Council
Received
24 Jul 2020
Target date
18 Sep 2020
Decision date
22 Sep 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
20/2203
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
NW6 6SB
Council
Received
24 Jul 2020
Target date
18 Sep 2020
Decision date
22 Sep 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Planning statement
22 Sept 2020
Basement impact assessment
22 Sept 2020
Final delegated report
22 Sept 2020
Final decision notice
22 Sept 2020
Existing site survey
21 Sept 2020
Existing plans
21 Sept 2020
Proposed plans
21 Sept 2020
Location plan
21 Sept 2020
Applicationformredacted.pdf
24 Jul 2020
Planning statement
22 Sept 2020
Basement impact assessment
22 Sept 2020
Final delegated report
22 Sept 2020
Show all 9 rows
Final decision notice
22 Sept 2020
Existing site survey
21 Sept 2020
Existing plans
21 Sept 2020
Proposed plans
21 Sept 2020
Location plan
21 Sept 2020
Applicationformredacted.pdf
24 Jul 2020

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 22 Sep 2020, delegated decision by Sarah Dilley — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Jul 2020
Application received
18 Sep 2020
Statutory target date
22 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Sarah Dilley
24 Jul 2020
Application received
18 Sep 2020
Statutory target date
22 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Sarah Dilley

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development would result in substandard living accommodation for future occupants. The proposal would result in cramped living conditions in reference to Flats E and F, in particular the flats would be undersized and would not benefit from any private amenity space. The proposed development fails to accord with DMP 1, DMP 18 and DMP 19 of the Brent Development Management Polices Plan (2016).
2
The proposed development would require the extension to the existing crossover which would result in the loss of a mature street tree. The loss of the street tree would be detrimental to the visual amenity of the streetscene and would be contrary to Brent’s Domestic Vehicle Footway Crossover Policy and SPD 2: Residential Extensions and Alterations (2018).
1
The proposed development would result in substandard living accommodation for future occupants. The proposal would result in cramped living conditions in reference to Flats E and F, in particular the flats would be undersized and would not benefit from any private amenity space. The proposed development fails to accord with DMP 1, DMP 18 and DMP 19 of the Brent Development Management Polices Plan (2016).
2
The proposed development would require the extension to the existing crossover which would result in the loss of a mature street tree. The loss of the street tree would be detrimental to the visual amenity of the streetscene and would be contrary to Brent’s Domestic Vehicle Footway Crossover Policy and SPD 2: Residential Extensions and Alterations (2018).
Policies cited
DMP1DMP18DMP19

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
5
In support
0
Total comments
5
Objections
5
In support
0
Total comments
5
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.