Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentQueens Park ward20/2691
Planning application · Brent

20/2691.

Land next to 98, Wakeman Road, London

Full / Other Planning at Land next to 98, Wakeman Road, London, received 1 Sep 2020 — refused on 29 Nov 2023 (delegated, Curtis Thompson).

BrentQueens Park20/2691
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Nov 2023
169 wks
Decision time
161 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
28
Documents
28 linked
41
Objections
11 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of single storey detached dwellinghouse

Reference
20/2691
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
1 Sep 2020
Target date
18 Nov 2022
Decision date
29 Nov 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Reference
20/2691
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
1 Sep 2020
Target date
18 Nov 2022
Decision date
29 Nov 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal decision
21 Aug 2024
Final decision notice
29 Nov 2023
Final delegated report
28 Nov 2023
Sustainable urban drainage assessment
12 Oct 2022
Fire statement
12 Oct 2022
Proposed roof plan
12 Oct 2022
Section c-c (proposed side section)
12 Oct 2022
Proposed section b-b
10 Jan 2022
Proposed section a-a
10 Jan 2022
Proposed rear elevation
10 Jan 2022
Appeal decision
21 Aug 2024
Final decision notice
29 Nov 2023
Final delegated report
28 Nov 2023
Show all 10 rows
Sustainable urban drainage assessment
12 Oct 2022
Fire statement
12 Oct 2022
Proposed roof plan
12 Oct 2022
Section c-c (proposed side section)
12 Oct 2022
Proposed section b-b
10 Jan 2022
Proposed section a-a
10 Jan 2022
Proposed rear elevation
10 Jan 2022

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 29 Nov 2023, delegated decision by Curtis Thompson — 169 weeks from submission (161 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Sep 2020
Application received
18 Nov 2022
Statutory target date
29 Nov 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Curtis Thompson
1 Sep 2020
Application received
18 Nov 2022
Statutory target date
29 Nov 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Curtis Thompson

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, massing and close proximity in relation to neighbouring habitable room windows/doors within no.96A Wakeman Road, would unacceptably reduce the already limited outlook for this neighbouring occupier, contrary to policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan.
2
The proposal would fail to provide an acceptable standard of accommodation for future occupiers. More specifically, given the insufficient private internal and external amenity space proposed, the proposal would fail to meet the minimum standards required for a unit of its type. The proposal would therefore fail to comply with policy BH13 of the Brent Local Plan and policy D6 of the London Plan.
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, massing and close proximity in relation to neighbouring habitable room windows/doors within no.96A Wakeman Road, would unacceptably reduce the already limited outlook for this neighbouring occupier, contrary to policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan.
2
The proposal would fail to provide an acceptable standard of accommodation for future occupiers. More specifically, given the insufficient private internal and external amenity space proposed, the proposal would fail to meet the minimum standards required for a unit of its type. The proposal would therefore fail to comply with policy BH13 of the Brent Local Plan and policy D6 of the London Plan.
Policies cited
DMP1BH13D6

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
41
In support
11
Total comments
52
Objections
41
In support
11
Total comments
52
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.