Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentTokyngton ward20/3854
Planning application · Brent

20/3854.

Tokyngton Community Centre, St Michaels Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6SA

Full / Other Planning at Tokyngton Community Centre, St Michaels Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6SA, received 24 Nov 2020 — refused on 30 Apr 2021 (delegated, Liam McFadden).

BrentTokyngtonHA9 6SA20/3854
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 Apr 2021
22 wks
Decision time
14 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
5
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retrospective permission for single storey rear extension to community centre

Reference
20/3854
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA9 6SA
Council
Received
24 Nov 2020
Validated
15 Mar 2021
Target date
10 May 2021
Decision date
30 Apr 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Reference
20/3854
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA9 6SA
Council
Received
24 Nov 2020
Validated
15 Mar 2021
Target date
10 May 2021
Decision date
30 Apr 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal decision
21 Jul 2022
01location92858610000.pdf
30 Apr 2021
02blockplan92858610000.pdf
30 Apr 2021
Design and access
30 Apr 2021
Existing plans and elevations
30 Apr 2021
Pre-existing plans and elevations
30 Apr 2021
Supporting statement
30 Apr 2021
Final decision notice
30 Apr 2021
Final delegated report
29 Apr 2021
Application form
15 Mar 2021
Appeal decision
21 Jul 2022
01location92858610000.pdf
30 Apr 2021
02blockplan92858610000.pdf
30 Apr 2021
Show all 10 rows
Design and access
30 Apr 2021
Existing plans and elevations
30 Apr 2021
Pre-existing plans and elevations
30 Apr 2021
Supporting statement
30 Apr 2021
Final decision notice
30 Apr 2021
Final delegated report
29 Apr 2021
Application form
15 Mar 2021

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 30 Apr 2021, delegated decision by Liam McFadden — 22 weeks from submission (14 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Nov 2020
Application received
15 Mar 2021
Application validated
10 May 2021
Statutory target date
30 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Liam McFadden
24 Nov 2020
Application received
15 Mar 2021
Application validated
10 May 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
30 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Liam McFadden

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The subject extension by reason of unsympathetic design and poor quality materials in this prominent location results in an extension which fails to respect or relate to the host building or the local context. Furthermore, it results in the loss of designated Open Space without mitigation or justification to demonstrate that any community benefits of the extension outweigh the harm. It would therefore be contrary to Policies D4, G4 and S1 of The London Plan (2021), Policy CP18 of the Core Strategy (2018), DMP1 of the Development Management Policies (2016) and policy BSI1 of Brent's Draft Local Plan 2020.
1
The subject extension by reason of unsympathetic design and poor quality materials in this prominent location results in an extension which fails to respect or relate to the host building or the local context. Furthermore, it results in the loss of designated Open Space without mitigation or justification to demonstrate that any community benefits of the extension outweigh the harm. It would therefore be contrary to Policies D4, G4 and S1 of The London Plan (2021), Policy CP18 of the Core Strategy (2018), DMP1 of the Development Management Policies (2016) and policy BSI1 of Brent's Draft Local Plan 2020.
Policies cited
D4G4S1CP18DMP1BSI1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
5
In support
0
Total comments
6
Objections
5
In support
0
Total comments
6
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.