Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Conversion of building into 8 self-contained flats and works to include infill and rear extensions at ground floor, mansard roof extension and internal reconfiguration, replacement of existing windows and doors with aluminium framed double glazed windows and doors, removal of vehicular access, provision of cycle and refuse storage, landscaping and boundary treatment
Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 15 Apr 2021, delegated decision by Sarah Dilley — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
4 Feb 2021
Application received
17 Feb 2021
Application validated
14 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
15 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Sarah Dilley
4 Feb 2021
Application received
17 Feb 2021
Application validated
14 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
15 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Sarah Dilley
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development would result in the subdivision of two family sized dwellings without
adequate re-provision. The development would therefore fail to comply with CP 21 of the Core
Strategy and DMP 17 of the Brent Development Management Policies.
2
The proposed development, in particular units 01 and 02 at ground floor by reason of the proximity
of boundary treatments and the proposed cycle store structure to bedroom windows, would result
in an unacceptable sense of enclosure with poor light and outlook to the bedrooms for future
occupiers. The proposed development is contrary to DMP 1 and 18 of the Development
Management Policies Plan (2016) and the SPD1 Brent Design Guide (2018) and Table 3.1 of the
London Plan 2021.
3
The proposed design of the ground floor front elevation by reason of fenestration placement,
design of entrances, the proposed facia and materials is considered to result in an incongruous
and poor design with a lack of coherence. The proposed development is contrary to DMP 1 of the
Development Management Policies Plan (2016) and the SPD1 Brent Design Guide (2018).
1
The proposed development would result in the subdivision of two family sized dwellings without
adequate re-provision. The development would therefore fail to comply with CP 21 of the Core
Strategy and DMP 17 of the Brent Development Management Policies.
2
The proposed development, in particular units 01 and 02 at ground floor by reason of the proximity
of boundary treatments and the proposed cycle store structure to bedroom windows, would result
in an unacceptable sense of enclosure with poor light and outlook to the bedrooms for future
occupiers. The proposed development is contrary to DMP 1 and 18 of the Development
Management Policies Plan (2016) and the SPD1 Brent Design Guide (2018) and Table 3.1 of the
London Plan 2021.
3
The proposed design of the ground floor front elevation by reason of fenestration placement,
design of entrances, the proposed facia and materials is considered to result in an incongruous
and poor design with a lack of coherence. The proposed development is contrary to DMP 1 of the
Development Management Policies Plan (2016) and the SPD1 Brent Design Guide (2018).
Policies cited
CP21DMP17DMP1Development Management Policies 18London Plan 3.1
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.