Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentQueensbury ward21/0875
Planning application · Brent

21/0875.

76-77 Capitol Industrial Park, Capitol Way, London, NW9 0EQ

Full / Other Planning at 76-77 Capitol Industrial Park, Capitol Way, London, NW9 0EQ, received 11 Mar 2021 — refused on 13 May 2021 (delegated, Sabrina Mohammed).

BrentQueensburyNW9 0EQ21/0875
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 May 2021
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed alterations to existing Vehicle Servicing Centre to incorporate ancillary sales area for commercial vehicles including enlarging window openings and installation of glazed curtain wall units and a new fire exit door to north west elevation.

Reference
21/0875
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW9 0EQ
Council
Received
11 Mar 2021
Validated
19 Mar 2021
Target date
14 May 2021
Decision date
13 May 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/0875
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW9 0EQ
Council
Received
11 Mar 2021
Validated
19 Mar 2021
Target date
14 May 2021
Decision date
13 May 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Location plan
13 May 2021
Existing elevations
13 May 2021
Proposed site plan
13 May 2021
Proposed elevations
13 May 2021
Existing site plan
13 May 2021
Proposed floor plans
13 May 2021
Existing floor plans
13 May 2021
Final delegated report
13 May 2021
Final decision notice
13 May 2021
Client statement
11 Mar 2021
Location plan
13 May 2021
Existing elevations
13 May 2021
Proposed site plan
13 May 2021
Show all 10 rows
Proposed elevations
13 May 2021
Existing site plan
13 May 2021
Proposed floor plans
13 May 2021
Existing floor plans
13 May 2021
Final delegated report
13 May 2021
Final decision notice
13 May 2021
Client statement
11 Mar 2021

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 13 May 2021, delegated decision by Sabrina Mohammed — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Mar 2021
Application received
19 Mar 2021
Application validated
14 May 2021
Statutory target date
13 May 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Sabrina Mohammed
11 Mar 2021
Application received
19 Mar 2021
Application validated
14 May 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
13 May 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Sabrina Mohammed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed layout, by reason of insufficient information provided to demonstrate how a car transporter would access the site safely without causing obstruction of public highway, as well as failure to provide a safe pedestrian access, is contrary to policy DMP13 13 of Brent's Development Policies 2016 and Policy T4 of the London Plan 2021. DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/0875 Page 2 of 3
1
The proposed layout, by reason of insufficient information provided to demonstrate how a car transporter would access the site safely without causing obstruction of public highway, as well as failure to provide a safe pedestrian access, is contrary to policy DMP13 13 of Brent's Development Policies 2016 and Policy T4 of the London Plan 2021. DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/0875 Page 2 of 3
Policies cited
Brent's Development Policies 13T4

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.