Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentQueens Park ward21/1683
Planning application · Brent

21/1683.

79 Ashburnham Road, London, NW10 5SA

Householder at 79 Ashburnham Road, London, NW10 5SA, received 7 May 2021 — refused on 4 Aug 2021 (delegated, Andrew Mortimer).

BrentQueens ParkNW10 5SA21/1683
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Aug 2021
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed rear dormer window, roof extension with dormer window to the rear projection, one rear rooflight, three front rooflights and a single storey rear side extension to dwellinghouse.

Reference
21/1683
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW10 5SA
Council
Received
7 May 2021
Validated
17 May 2021
Target date
4 Aug 2021
Decision date
4 Aug 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/1683
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW10 5SA
Council
Received
7 May 2021
Validated
17 May 2021
Target date
4 Aug 2021
Decision date
4 Aug 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Location plan
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed ground floor plans
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed second floor plans
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed section bb
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed roof plans
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed first floor plan
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed side section
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed front and rear elevations
4 Aug 2021
Final delegated report
4 Aug 2021
Final decision notice
4 Aug 2021
Location plan
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed ground floor plans
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed second floor plans
4 Aug 2021
Show all 10 rows
Existing and proposed section bb
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed roof plans
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed first floor plan
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed side section
4 Aug 2021
Existing and proposed front and rear elevations
4 Aug 2021
Final delegated report
4 Aug 2021
Final decision notice
4 Aug 2021

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 4 Aug 2021, delegated decision by Andrew Mortimer — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
7 May 2021
Application received
17 May 2021
Application validated
4 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
4 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Mortimer
7 May 2021
Application received
17 May 2021
Application validated
4 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Mortimer

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear dormer window and dormer extension to outrigger roof due to its design, size and siting, would be an overly dominant and unsympathetic addition detrimental to the character and appearance of the host dwellinghouse and the wider area. The development is therefore contrary to Policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan Development Management Policies 2016 and Supplementary Planning Document 2.
1
The proposed rear dormer window and dormer extension to outrigger roof due to its design, size and siting, would be an overly dominant and unsympathetic addition detrimental to the character and appearance of the host dwellinghouse and the wider area. The development is therefore contrary to Policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan Development Management Policies 2016 and Supplementary Planning Document 2.
Policies cited
DMP1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.