Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentKenton ward21/1688
Planning application · Brent

21/1688.

8 Sedgecombe Avenue, Harrow, HA3 0HL

Householder at 8 Sedgecombe Avenue, Harrow, HA3 0HL, received 7 May 2021 — refused on 15 Jul 2021 (delegated, Brooke Storey-Vowles).

BrentKentonHA3 0HL21/1688
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 Jul 2021
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed single storey rear extension, pitched roof to existing rear extension, replacement of rear garden doors, erection of conservatory and canopy to rear, new wall and slope in rear garden of dwellinghouse

Reference
21/1688
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Postcode
HA3 0HL
Ward
Council
Received
7 May 2021
Validated
20 May 2021
Target date
15 Jul 2021
Decision date
15 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/1688
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Postcode
HA3 0HL
Ward
Council
Received
7 May 2021
Validated
20 May 2021
Target date
15 Jul 2021
Decision date
15 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Location plan
15 Jul 2021
Existing plans and elevations
15 Jul 2021
Proposed plans and elevations
15 Jul 2021
Final delegated report
15 Jul 2021
Final decision notice
15 Jul 2021
Application form
7 May 2021
Location plan
15 Jul 2021
Existing plans and elevations
15 Jul 2021
Proposed plans and elevations
15 Jul 2021
Show all 6 rows
Final delegated report
15 Jul 2021
Final decision notice
15 Jul 2021
Application form
7 May 2021

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 15 Jul 2021, delegated decision by Brooke Storey-Vowles — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
7 May 2021
Application received
20 May 2021
Application validated
15 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
15 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Brooke Storey-Vowles
7 May 2021
Application received
20 May 2021
Application validated
15 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
15 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Brooke Storey-Vowles

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear extension by reason of its unacceptable setting, scale and design would have a significant impact on neighbouring amenity and the character of the dwelling, contrary to Policy DMP1 of the Brent Development Policies Document 2016, and Brent’s Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD2 DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/1688 Page 2 of 3
1
The proposed rear extension by reason of its unacceptable setting, scale and design would have a significant impact on neighbouring amenity and the character of the dwelling, contrary to Policy DMP1 of the Brent Development Policies Document 2016, and Brent’s Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD2 DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/1688 Page 2 of 3
Policies cited
DMP1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.