Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentKensal Green - WARD NO LONGER EXISTS ward21/1729
Planning application · Brent

21/1729.

Land rear of 231 All Souls Avenue, London, NW10

Full / Other Planning at Land rear of 231 All Souls Avenue, London, NW10, received 11 May 2021 — refused on 1 Sep 2021 (delegated, Michele Katzler).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Sep 2021
16 wks
Decision time
8 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
10
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed temporary retention (12 months until 30 June 2022) of 23.5m high temporary mast with antenna headframe above (top height 23.5m) and associated ancillary development to rear of 229 All Souls Avenue, NW10

Reference
21/1729
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Case officer
Council
Received
11 May 2021
Validated
30 Jun 2021
Target date
1 Sep 2021
Decision date
1 Sep 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Reference
21/1729
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Council
Received
11 May 2021
Validated
30 Jun 2021
Target date
1 Sep 2021
Decision date
1 Sep 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
All drawings
29 Apr 2022
Ofcom 5g guide
29 Apr 2022
Appeal decision
29 Apr 2022
Final delegated report
5 Sept 2021
Final decision notice
1 Sept 2021
Application form
11 May 2021
All drawings
29 Apr 2022
Ofcom 5g guide
29 Apr 2022
Appeal decision
29 Apr 2022
Show all 6 rows
Final delegated report
5 Sept 2021
Final decision notice
1 Sept 2021
Application form
11 May 2021

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 1 Sep 2021, delegated decision by Michele Katzler — 16 weeks from submission (8 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
11 May 2021
Application received
30 Jun 2021
Application validated
1 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
1 Sep 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Michele Katzler
11 May 2021
Application received
30 Jun 2021
Application validated
1 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
1 Sep 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Michele Katzler

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed telecommunications mast due to its height, width, design and materials, and siting in close proximity to residences and in a suburban residential area, constitutes an obtrusive and incongruous feature that fails to complement the character or context of the locality, and which detracts from the attractive qualities of the streetscene, contrary to section 12 of the NPPF (2021), Brent Core Strategy CP17 (2010), and Policies DMP1 - General Planning Policy- of Brent Development Management Policies (2016).
1
The proposed telecommunications mast due to its height, width, design and materials, and siting in close proximity to residences and in a suburban residential area, constitutes an obtrusive and incongruous feature that fails to complement the character or context of the locality, and which detracts from the attractive qualities of the streetscene, contrary to section 12 of the NPPF (2021), Brent Core Strategy CP17 (2010), and Policies DMP1 - General Planning Policy- of Brent Development Management Policies (2016).
Policies cited
NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
10
In support
0
Total comments
10
Objections
10
In support
0
Total comments
10
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.