Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentAlperton ward21/1765
Planning application · Brent

21/1765.

36A Carlyon Road, Wembley, HA0 1JE

Full / Other Planning at 36A Carlyon Road, Wembley, HA0 1JE, received 13 May 2021 — refused on 20 Jul 2021 (delegated, Brooke Storey-Vowles).

BrentAlpertonHA0 1JE21/1765
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Jul 2021
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Rear dormer loft conversion with Juliet balcony and 2 front rooflights, hip to gable extension and raising of ridge height to rear of the flat.

Reference
21/1765
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Postcode
HA0 1JE
Council
Received
13 May 2021
Validated
25 May 2021
Target date
20 Jul 2021
Decision date
20 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/1765
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Postcode
HA0 1JE
Council
Received
13 May 2021
Validated
25 May 2021
Target date
20 Jul 2021
Decision date
20 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Existing elevations and sections
20 Jul 2021
Existing floor plans
20 Jul 2021
Proposed floor plans
20 Jul 2021
Proposed roof plan and site plan
20 Jul 2021
Proposed elevations and sections
20 Jul 2021
Site map
20 Jul 2021
Location plan
20 Jul 2021
Final delegated report
20 Jul 2021
Final decision notice
20 Jul 2021
Existing elevations and sections
20 Jul 2021
Existing floor plans
20 Jul 2021
Proposed floor plans
20 Jul 2021
Show all 9 rows
Proposed roof plan and site plan
20 Jul 2021
Proposed elevations and sections
20 Jul 2021
Site map
20 Jul 2021
Location plan
20 Jul 2021
Final delegated report
20 Jul 2021
Final decision notice
20 Jul 2021

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 Jul 2021, delegated decision by Brooke Storey-Vowles — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 May 2021
Application received
25 May 2021
Application validated
20 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
20 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Brooke Storey-Vowles
13 May 2021
Application received
25 May 2021
Application validated
20 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Brooke Storey-Vowles

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal by reason of the raising of the ridge and associated alteration to the pitch angle of the existing first floor rear projection and the associated rear dormer, when viewed in conjunction would result in a bulky and incongruous addition which would have a detrimental impact on the character of the property and the streetscene. The development would be contrary to Development Management Policies DMP1 and Brent’s Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD2. DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/1765 Page 2 of 3
1
The proposal by reason of the raising of the ridge and associated alteration to the pitch angle of the existing first floor rear projection and the associated rear dormer, when viewed in conjunction would result in a bulky and incongruous addition which would have a detrimental impact on the character of the property and the streetscene. The development would be contrary to Development Management Policies DMP1 and Brent’s Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD2. DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/1765 Page 2 of 3

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.