Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of existing bay window, single storey rear infill extension, first floor side extension and alteration made to the fenestration of the dwellinghouse.
Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 Aug 2021, delegated decision by Lena Summers — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
17 Jun 2021
Application received
12 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
12 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Lena Summers
17 Jun 2021
Application received
12 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
12 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Lena Summers
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor side extension by reason of its roof form, design and interaction with the
existing side dormer would result in a development that fails to appear suitably subservient to the
original dwellinghouse and is detrimental to the character and appearance of the house. This is
contrary to Local Plan Policy DMP1 of the Development Management Policies (2016) and SPD2
Residential Extensions and Alterations (2018).
2
The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its depth and proximity to neighbouring
boundary would result in an overbearing impact, increased sense of enclosure and loss of outlook
to adjoining occupier no.74. This is contrary to Local Plan Policy DMP1 of the Development
Management Policies (2016) and SPD2 Residential Extensions and Alterations (2018).
DocFDN
Document Imaged Ref: 21/2253 Page 2 of 3
1
The proposed first floor side extension by reason of its roof form, design and interaction with the
existing side dormer would result in a development that fails to appear suitably subservient to the
original dwellinghouse and is detrimental to the character and appearance of the house. This is
contrary to Local Plan Policy DMP1 of the Development Management Policies (2016) and SPD2
Residential Extensions and Alterations (2018).
2
The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its depth and proximity to neighbouring
boundary would result in an overbearing impact, increased sense of enclosure and loss of outlook
to adjoining occupier no.74. This is contrary to Local Plan Policy DMP1 of the Development
Management Policies (2016) and SPD2 Residential Extensions and Alterations (2018).
DocFDN
Document Imaged Ref: 21/2253 Page 2 of 3
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.