Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentMapesbury - WARD NO LONGER EXISTS wardNW2 4HN10 Teignmouth Road, London, NW2 4HN21/3427
Planning application · Brent

21/3427.

10 Teignmouth Road, London, NW2 4HN

Householder at 10 Teignmouth Road, London, NW2 4HN, received 9 Sep 2021 — refused on 5 Nov 2021 (delegated, Lauren Brown).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Nov 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed replacement of window to front facing dormer of Hostel

Reference
21/3427
Type
Householder
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
9 Sep 2021
Validated
15 Sep 2021
Target date
10 Nov 2021
Decision date
5 Nov 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/3427
Type
Householder
Show all 17 rows
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
9 Sep 2021
Validated
15 Sep 2021
Target date
10 Nov 2021
Decision date
5 Nov 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Design and access statement and photos
5 Nov 2021
Block plan
5 Nov 2021
Site location plan
5 Nov 2021
Heritage statement
5 Nov 2021
Existing and proposed front elevation
5 Nov 2021
Existing window elevation and section
5 Nov 2021
Proposed window elevation and section
5 Nov 2021
Final delegated report
5 Nov 2021
Final decision notice
5 Nov 2021
Application form
10 Sept 2021
Design and access statement and photos
5 Nov 2021
Block plan
5 Nov 2021
Site location plan
5 Nov 2021
Show all 10 rows
Heritage statement
5 Nov 2021
Existing and proposed front elevation
5 Nov 2021
Existing window elevation and section
5 Nov 2021
Proposed window elevation and section
5 Nov 2021
Final delegated report
5 Nov 2021
Final decision notice
5 Nov 2021
Application form
10 Sept 2021

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 Nov 2021, delegated decision by Lauren Brown — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Sep 2021
Application received
15 Sep 2021
Application validated
10 Nov 2021
Statutory target date
5 Nov 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Lauren Brown
9 Sep 2021
Application received
15 Sep 2021
Application validated
10 Nov 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 Nov 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Lauren Brown

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal, by reason of its poor design and use of PVCU materials, would have an adverse and harmful impact to the visual amenity of the street scene and would not preserve the character and appearance of the Mapesbury Conservation Area. The proposal does not accord with policies DMP1 and DMP7 of the Development Management Policies Plan (2016), the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) and the Mapesbury Conservation Area Design Guide (2018). Refusal is accordingly recommended. DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/3427 Page 2 of 3
1
The proposal, by reason of its poor design and use of PVCU materials, would have an adverse and harmful impact to the visual amenity of the street scene and would not preserve the character and appearance of the Mapesbury Conservation Area. The proposal does not accord with policies DMP1 and DMP7 of the Development Management Policies Plan (2016), the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) and the Mapesbury Conservation Area Design Guide (2018). Refusal is accordingly recommended. DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/3427 Page 2 of 3
Policies cited
DMP1DMP7NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.