Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentDollis Hill ward21/3465
Planning application · Brent

21/3465.

1 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RL

Householder at 1 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RL, received 13 Sep 2021 — refused on 7 Dec 2021 (delegated, Andrew Mortimer).

BrentDollis HillNW2 7RL21/3465
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 Dec 2021
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
7
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of existing garage, erection of two storey side and rear extension and single storey rear extension to dwellinghouse.

Reference
21/3465
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW2 7RL
Council
Received
13 Sep 2021
Target date
8 Nov 2021
Decision date
7 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/3465
Type
Householder
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW2 7RL
Council
Received
13 Sep 2021
Target date
8 Nov 2021
Decision date
7 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Location plan
7 Dec 2021
Existing drawings
7 Dec 2021
Proposed drawings, existing and proposed roof and block plan
7 Dec 2021
Final delegated report
7 Dec 2021
Final decision notice
7 Dec 2021
Transport
10 Nov 2021
Application form redacted
14 Sept 2021
Location plan
7 Dec 2021
Existing drawings
7 Dec 2021
Proposed drawings, existing and proposed roof and block plan
7 Dec 2021
Show all 7 rows
Final delegated report
7 Dec 2021
Final decision notice
7 Dec 2021
Transport
10 Nov 2021
Application form redacted
14 Sept 2021

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 7 Dec 2021, delegated decision by Andrew Mortimer — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Sep 2021
Application received
8 Nov 2021
Statutory target date
7 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Mortimer
13 Sep 2021
Application received
8 Nov 2021
Statutory target date
7 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Mortimer

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed two storey extension by reason of the design, roof form and its relationship with the existing dwelling would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the dwelling and wider locality. The development therefore fails to comply with DMP 1 of the Development Management Policies 2016 and with Supplementary Planning Document 2 – Residential Extensions and Alterations 2018.
2
The proposed two-storey extension by virtue of its proximity to the boundary would have an unacceptable overbearing impact on the existing amenities of the adjoining occupiers on Dollis Hill Lane contrary to DMP1 of the Development Management Policies 2016, and the guidance contained within Supplementary Planning Document SPD2. DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/3465 Page 2 of 3
1
The proposed two storey extension by reason of the design, roof form and its relationship with the existing dwelling would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the dwelling and wider locality. The development therefore fails to comply with DMP 1 of the Development Management Policies 2016 and with Supplementary Planning Document 2 – Residential Extensions and Alterations 2018.
2
The proposed two-storey extension by virtue of its proximity to the boundary would have an unacceptable overbearing impact on the existing amenities of the adjoining occupiers on Dollis Hill Lane contrary to DMP1 of the Development Management Policies 2016, and the guidance contained within Supplementary Planning Document SPD2. DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 21/3465 Page 2 of 3
Policies cited
DMP1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
7
In support
0
Total comments
7
Objections
7
In support
0
Total comments
7
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.