Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentFryent - WARD NO LONGER EXISTS wardNW9 0BD22 Coniston Gardens, London, NW9 0BD21/3665
Planning application · Brent

21/3665.

22 Coniston Gardens, London, NW9 0BD

Householder at 22 Coniston Gardens, London, NW9 0BD, received 28 Sep 2021 — refused on 23 Nov 2021 (delegated, Mahya Fatemi).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Nov 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of rear outbuilding to dwellinghouse

Reference
21/3665
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
28 Sep 2021
Target date
23 Nov 2021
Decision date
23 Nov 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/3665
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
28 Sep 2021
Target date
23 Nov 2021
Decision date
23 Nov 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Location plan
23 Nov 2021
Block plan
23 Nov 2021
Proposed plans elevations and section
23 Nov 2021
Final delegated report
23 Nov 2021
Final decision notice
23 Nov 2021
Application form
29 Sept 2021
Location plan
23 Nov 2021
Block plan
23 Nov 2021
Proposed plans elevations and section
23 Nov 2021
Show all 6 rows
Final delegated report
23 Nov 2021
Final decision notice
23 Nov 2021
Application form
29 Sept 2021

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 23 Nov 2021, delegated decision by Mahya Fatemi — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Sep 2021
Application received
23 Nov 2021
Statutory target date
23 Nov 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahya Fatemi
28 Sep 2021
Application received
23 Nov 2021
Statutory target date
23 Nov 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahya Fatemi

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The retention of the outbuilding due to its excessive height and proximity to neighbouring boundaries would be out of keeping with the character and pattern of development in the area and would impact the amenities of the neighbouring properties of 20 and 24 Coniston Gardens. The proposal would fail to comply with Policy CP17 of the Core Strategy, Policies DMP1 and DMP18 of Brent's Development Management Policies, draft policies DMP1 and BH12 of Brent's Draft Local Plan 2020, and Brent Planning Document SPD2 (2018).
1
The retention of the outbuilding due to its excessive height and proximity to neighbouring boundaries would be out of keeping with the character and pattern of development in the area and would impact the amenities of the neighbouring properties of 20 and 24 Coniston Gardens. The proposal would fail to comply with Policy CP17 of the Core Strategy, Policies DMP1 and DMP18 of Brent's Development Management Policies, draft policies DMP1 and BH12 of Brent's Draft Local Plan 2020, and Brent Planning Document SPD2 (2018).
Policies cited
CP17DMP1DMP18BH12

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.