Planning application · Brent
21/4179.
71 Barn Hill, Wembley, HA9 9LL
Householder at 71 Barn Hill, Wembley, HA9 9LL, received 11 Nov 2021 — refused on 10 Jan 2022 (delegated, Jasmin Tailor).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 Jan 2022
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
2
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of detached garage/storage, removal of bay window to ground-floor rear and erection of a single-storey side and rear extension and replacement of first-floor window to side elevation of dwellinghouse
Reference
21/4179
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA9 9LL
Ward
Council
Received
11 Nov 2021
Validated
15 Nov 2021
Target date
10 Jan 2022
Decision date
10 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
21/4179
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA9 9LL
Ward
Council
Received
11 Nov 2021
Validated
15 Nov 2021
Target date
10 Jan 2022
Decision date
10 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 10 Jan 2022, delegated decision by Jasmin Tailor — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
11 Nov 2021
Application received
15 Nov 2021
Application validated
10 Jan 2022
Statutory target date
10 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Jasmin Tailor
11 Nov 2021
Application received
15 Nov 2021
Application validated
10 Jan 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
10 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Jasmin Tailor
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed side extension by reason of its roof design would be out of character with the
prevailing form of development of the locality and would have a detrimental impact on the
character and appearance of both the host property and the character of the conservation area.
Furthermore, the design of the rear extension together with the lack of set back behind the side
extension, would result in an extension that is out of scale with the original dwellinghouse, and
would appear of an discordant design to the main house. This would be contrary to DMP1 &
DMP7 of the Brent Development Management Policies (2016) and the Barn Hill Conservation Area
Design Guide (2013).
2
The proposed rear extensions by reason of their excessive depth and height, would result in a
harmful impact on neighbouring amenity at No. 73 Barn Hill when viewed from rear habitable room
windows and the rear garden, through loss of outlook and overbearing appearance. This would be
contrary to policy DMP1 of Brent's Development Management Policies (2016) and the guidance
set out in the Barn Hill Conservation Area Design Guide (2013).
1
The proposed side extension by reason of its roof design would be out of character with the
prevailing form of development of the locality and would have a detrimental impact on the
character and appearance of both the host property and the character of the conservation area.
Furthermore, the design of the rear extension together with the lack of set back behind the side
extension, would result in an extension that is out of scale with the original dwellinghouse, and
would appear of an discordant design to the main house. This would be contrary to DMP1 &
DMP7 of the Brent Development Management Policies (2016) and the Barn Hill Conservation Area
Design Guide (2013).
2
The proposed rear extensions by reason of their excessive depth and height, would result in a
harmful impact on neighbouring amenity at No. 73 Barn Hill when viewed from rear habitable room
windows and the rear garden, through loss of outlook and overbearing appearance. This would be
contrary to policy DMP1 of Brent's Development Management Policies (2016) and the guidance
set out in the Barn Hill Conservation Area Design Guide (2013).
Policies cited
DMP1DMP7
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.