Planning application · Brent
22/0522.
27 Park Avenue, London, NW2 5AN
Full / Other Planning at 27 Park Avenue, London, NW2 5AN, received 15 Feb 2022 — refused on 25 Apr 2022 (delegated, Sarah Dilley).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Apr 2022
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Proposed single storey rear extension to ground floor, single storey rear extension to first floor and loft conversion with rear dormer window to facilitate creation of 1x self-contained flat in new loft space.
Reference
22/0522
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW2 5AN
Ward
Council
Received
15 Feb 2022
Target date
12 Apr 2022
Decision date
25 Apr 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
22/0522
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW2 5AN
Ward
Council
Received
15 Feb 2022
Target date
12 Apr 2022
Decision date
25 Apr 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 25 Apr 2022, delegated decision by Sarah Dilley — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
15 Feb 2022
Application received
12 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
25 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Sarah Dilley
15 Feb 2022
Application received
12 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
25 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Sarah Dilley
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of the proximity of bedroom windows (Flat 1 and Flat 2) to
the built form and in the case of Flat 1 boundaries would result in poor living conditions in terms of
poor outlook and an unacceptable sense if enclosure. The proposed development is contrary to
Policy DMP 1 of the Brent Local Plan.
2
Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed first floor side
window would not result in harmful overlooking to first floor windows at number 29 Park Avenue
and vice versa. The proposed development is contrary to Policy DMP 1 of the Brent Local Plan.
3
The junction of rear dormer and roof of first floor rear extension, by virtue of its siting, design and
size would result in an overly prominent and discordant addition. It would fail to appear subservient
to the original building to the detriment of the character and appearance of the original building
and the surrounding area. This would be contrary to the requirements of policy DMP1 of the Brent
Local Plan and the guidance contained in Brent’s SPD2 guidance (2018).
1
The proposed development, by reason of the proximity of bedroom windows (Flat 1 and Flat 2) to
the built form and in the case of Flat 1 boundaries would result in poor living conditions in terms of
poor outlook and an unacceptable sense if enclosure. The proposed development is contrary to
Policy DMP 1 of the Brent Local Plan.
2
Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed first floor side
window would not result in harmful overlooking to first floor windows at number 29 Park Avenue
and vice versa. The proposed development is contrary to Policy DMP 1 of the Brent Local Plan.
3
The junction of rear dormer and roof of first floor rear extension, by virtue of its siting, design and
size would result in an overly prominent and discordant addition. It would fail to appear subservient
to the original building to the detriment of the character and appearance of the original building
and the surrounding area. This would be contrary to the requirements of policy DMP1 of the Brent
Local Plan and the guidance contained in Brent’s SPD2 guidance (2018).
Policies cited
DMP1
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.