Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentFryent - WARD NO LONGER EXISTS ward22/0827
Planning application · Brent

22/0827.

335 Church Lane, London, NW9 8JD

Full / Other Planning at 335 Church Lane, London, NW9 8JD, received 3 Mar 2022 — refused on 9 May 2022 (delegated, Mahya Fatemi).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
9 May 2022
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of an existing dwellinghouse into two self-contained flats.

Reference
22/0827
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW9 8JD
Council
Received
3 Mar 2022
Validated
14 Mar 2022
Target date
9 May 2022
Decision date
9 May 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Reference
22/0827
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW9 8JD
Council
Received
3 Mar 2022
Validated
14 Mar 2022
Target date
9 May 2022
Decision date
9 May 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal decision
28 Apr 2023
Final decision notice
9 May 2022
Existing floor plans
4 Mar 2022
Proposed floor plans
4 Mar 2022
Existing elevations
4 Mar 2022
Proposed elevations
4 Mar 2022
Proposed block plan
4 Mar 2022
Design & acess statement
4 Mar 2022
Cil form
4 Mar 2022
Application form redacted
4 Mar 2022
Appeal decision
28 Apr 2023
Final decision notice
9 May 2022
Existing floor plans
4 Mar 2022
Show all 10 rows
Proposed floor plans
4 Mar 2022
Existing elevations
4 Mar 2022
Proposed elevations
4 Mar 2022
Proposed block plan
4 Mar 2022
Design & acess statement
4 Mar 2022
Cil form
4 Mar 2022
Application form redacted
4 Mar 2022

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 9 May 2022, delegated decision by Mahya Fatemi — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Mar 2022
Application received
14 Mar 2022
Application validated
9 May 2022
Statutory target date
9 May 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahya Fatemi
3 Mar 2022
Application received
14 Mar 2022
Application validated
9 May 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
9 May 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahya Fatemi

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development would result in the loss of a larger family sized residential unit for which there is an identified need in the borough, in an area with poor public transport accessibility resulting in higher levels of car dependency. This is contrary to policies BH4 and BH11 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041.
2
The submission fails to demonstrate that the proposed development will achieve an appropriate standard of fire safety and the proposal is therefore contrary to Policy D12A of the London Plan (2021). DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 22/0827 Page 2 of 3
1
The proposed development would result in the loss of a larger family sized residential unit for which there is an identified need in the borough, in an area with poor public transport accessibility resulting in higher levels of car dependency. This is contrary to policies BH4 and BH11 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041.
2
The submission fails to demonstrate that the proposed development will achieve an appropriate standard of fire safety and the proposal is therefore contrary to Policy D12A of the London Plan (2021). DocFDN Document Imaged Ref: 22/0827 Page 2 of 3
Policies cited
BH4BH11D12A

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.