Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentHarlesden & Kensal Green ward22/3522
Planning application · Brent

22/3522.

67B Wrottesley Road, London, NW10 5UL

Full / Other Planning at 67B Wrottesley Road, London, NW10 5UL, received 12 Oct 2022 — refused on 25 Jan 2023 (delegated, Sophie Butcher).

BrentHarlesden & Kensal GreenNW10 5UL22/3522
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Jan 2023
15 wks
Decision time
7 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed hip to gable end roof and rear dormer roof extensions with 1x front rooflight, 1x side window and raised of party wall to first floor flat.

Reference
22/3522
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW10 5UL
Council
Received
12 Oct 2022
Validated
30 Nov 2022
Target date
25 Jan 2023
Decision date
25 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Reference
22/3522
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW10 5UL
Council
Received
12 Oct 2022
Validated
30 Nov 2022
Target date
25 Jan 2023
Decision date
25 Jan 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal decision
20 Feb 2024
Existing first floor plan
25 Jan 2023
Proposed first floor plan
25 Jan 2023
Existing ground floor plan
25 Jan 2023
Proposed loft plan
25 Jan 2023
Existing site layout
25 Jan 2023
Proposed site layout
25 Jan 2023
Location plan
25 Jan 2023
Existing and proposed elevations
25 Jan 2023
Existing and proposed elevations
25 Jan 2023
Appeal decision
20 Feb 2024
Existing first floor plan
25 Jan 2023
Proposed first floor plan
25 Jan 2023
Show all 10 rows
Existing ground floor plan
25 Jan 2023
Proposed loft plan
25 Jan 2023
Existing site layout
25 Jan 2023
Proposed site layout
25 Jan 2023
Location plan
25 Jan 2023
Existing and proposed elevations
25 Jan 2023
Existing and proposed elevations
25 Jan 2023

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 25 Jan 2023, delegated decision by Sophie Butcher — 15 weeks from submission (7 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Oct 2022
Application received
30 Nov 2022
Application validated
25 Jan 2023
Statutory target date
25 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Sophie Butcher
12 Oct 2022
Application received
30 Nov 2022
Application validated
25 Jan 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
25 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Sophie Butcher

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed roof extensions, by reason of their size, siting and design would fail to respect the design and appearance of the host building and as result appear overly prominent and out of place. This impact would harm the character and context of the application site and fails to comply with the Development Plan, in particular policies DMP1 and BD1 of the Brent Local Plan and the design guidance in SPD2. DocFDN Ref: 22/3522 Page 3 of 3
1
The proposed roof extensions, by reason of their size, siting and design would fail to respect the design and appearance of the host building and as result appear overly prominent and out of place. This impact would harm the character and context of the application site and fails to comply with the Development Plan, in particular policies DMP1 and BD1 of the Brent Local Plan and the design guidance in SPD2. DocFDN Ref: 22/3522 Page 3 of 3
Policies cited
DMP1BD1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.