Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentQueensbury ward23/0391
Planning application · Brent

23/0391.

22 Rose Bates Drive, London, NW9 9QJ

Householder at 22 Rose Bates Drive, London, NW9 9QJ, received 6 Feb 2023 — refused on 12 Apr 2023 (delegated, Janseway Cheung).

BrentQueensburyNW9 9QJ23/0391
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Apr 2023
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed demolition of existing conservatory and erection of single storey rear ground extension, new ground floor side window and pv solar panels to roof and extension to dwellinghouse

Reference
23/0391
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW9 9QJ
Council
Received
6 Feb 2023
Validated
15 Feb 2023
Target date
12 Apr 2023
Decision date
12 Apr 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
23/0391
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW9 9QJ
Council
Received
6 Feb 2023
Validated
15 Feb 2023
Target date
12 Apr 2023
Decision date
12 Apr 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Existing floor plans
12 Apr 2023
Existing front elevations
12 Apr 2023
Existing rear and side elevations
12 Apr 2023
Proposed floor plans
12 Apr 2023
Proposed front elevations
12 Apr 2023
Proposed side and rear elevation
12 Apr 2023
Existing roof plan
12 Apr 2023
Proposed roof plan
12 Apr 2023
Location plan
12 Apr 2023
Final delegated report
12 Apr 2023
Existing floor plans
12 Apr 2023
Existing front elevations
12 Apr 2023
Existing rear and side elevations
12 Apr 2023
Show all 10 rows
Proposed floor plans
12 Apr 2023
Proposed front elevations
12 Apr 2023
Proposed side and rear elevation
12 Apr 2023
Existing roof plan
12 Apr 2023
Proposed roof plan
12 Apr 2023
Location plan
12 Apr 2023
Final delegated report
12 Apr 2023

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 12 Apr 2023, delegated decision by Janseway Cheung — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Feb 2023
Application received
15 Feb 2023
Application validated
12 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
12 Apr 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Janseway Cheung
6 Feb 2023
Application received
15 Feb 2023
Application validated
12 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
12 Apr 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Janseway Cheung

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its excessive depth and proximity to the neighbouring boundary, would have an unacceptable impact on the amenities of the neighbouring property at No. 20 and No.24 Rose Bates Drive in terms of daylight, sunlight, and increased sense of enclosure. This would be contrary to policy DMP1 of Brent's Local Plan (2019-2041) and the guidance set out in SPD 2 of the Residential Extensions and Alterations (2018).
1
The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its excessive depth and proximity to the neighbouring boundary, would have an unacceptable impact on the amenities of the neighbouring property at No. 20 and No.24 Rose Bates Drive in terms of daylight, sunlight, and increased sense of enclosure. This would be contrary to policy DMP1 of Brent's Local Plan (2019-2041) and the guidance set out in SPD 2 of the Residential Extensions and Alterations (2018).
Policies cited
DMP1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.