Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentQueens Park wardNW6 6RYFlat 1, 123 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY23/0512
Planning application · Brent

23/0512.

Flat 1, 123 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY

Full / Other Planning at Flat 1, 123 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY, received 15 Feb 2023 — refused on 25 Apr 2023 (delegated, Hebe Leung).

BrentQueens ParkNW6 6RY23/0512
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Apr 2023
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed rear garden hardstanding to ground floor maisonette

Reference
23/0512
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
15 Feb 2023
Validated
28 Feb 2023
Target date
25 Apr 2023
Decision date
25 Apr 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Reference
23/0512
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
15 Feb 2023
Validated
28 Feb 2023
Target date
25 Apr 2023
Decision date
25 Apr 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal decision
13 Mar 2024
Block plan
25 Apr 2023
Existing rear garden
25 Apr 2023
Proposed rear garden
25 Apr 2023
Location plan
25 Apr 2023
Final delegated report
25 Apr 2023
Final decision notice
25 Apr 2023
Applicationformredacted119399840000.pdf
15 Feb 2023
Appeal decision
13 Mar 2024
Block plan
25 Apr 2023
Existing rear garden
25 Apr 2023
Show all 8 rows
Proposed rear garden
25 Apr 2023
Location plan
25 Apr 2023
Final delegated report
25 Apr 2023
Final decision notice
25 Apr 2023
Applicationformredacted119399840000.pdf
15 Feb 2023

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 25 Apr 2023, delegated decision by Hebe Leung — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Feb 2023
Application received
28 Feb 2023
Application validated
25 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
25 Apr 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Hebe Leung
15 Feb 2023
Application received
28 Feb 2023
Application validated
25 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
25 Apr 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Hebe Leung

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed hardstanding and the loss of the soft landscaping in the rear garden would be harmful to the character and appearance of the site and the wider surrounding area. It does not retain the green area and fails to enhance the visual amenity of the locality. The proposal is contrary to Policy DMP1.
2
This proposal should be resisted, on the grounds that the loss of the soft landscaping is considered to be harmful to the water drainage of the site and is considered a loss of biodiversity. The proposal is contrary to Policies BSUI4 and BGI1 of the Brent Local Plan (2019-2041).
1
The proposed hardstanding and the loss of the soft landscaping in the rear garden would be harmful to the character and appearance of the site and the wider surrounding area. It does not retain the green area and fails to enhance the visual amenity of the locality. The proposal is contrary to Policy DMP1.
2
This proposal should be resisted, on the grounds that the loss of the soft landscaping is considered to be harmful to the water drainage of the site and is considered a loss of biodiversity. The proposal is contrary to Policies BSUI4 and BGI1 of the Brent Local Plan (2019-2041).
Policies cited
BSUI4BGI1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.