Planning application · Brent
23/1134.
45A Larch Road, London, NW2 6SG
Full / Other Planning at 45A Larch Road, London, NW2 6SG, received 10 Apr 2023 — refused on 10 Jul 2023 (delegated, Kim Pang).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 Jul 2023
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of single-storey side infill extension to ground floor flat
Reference
23/1134
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
10 Apr 2023
Validated
1 May 2023
Target date
10 Jul 2023
Decision date
10 Jul 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
23/1134
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
10 Apr 2023
Validated
1 May 2023
Target date
10 Jul 2023
Decision date
10 Jul 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 10 Jul 2023, delegated decision by Kim Pang — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
10 Apr 2023
Application received
1 May 2023
Application validated
10 Jul 2023
Statutory target date
10 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Kim Pang
10 Apr 2023
Application received
1 May 2023
Application validated
10 Jul 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
10 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Kim Pang
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed single storey side infill extension, by reason of its design, size and siting, would
appear as an overly prominent, dominant and incongruous addition, detrimental to the character
and appearance of the host property and surrounding area. As such, the proposal is contrary to
planning policy DMP1 & BD1 of Brent's Local Plan (2019-41) and the guidelines contained within
Supplementary Planning Document 2: Residential Extensions Design Guide (2018).
2
The proposed side infill extension, by reason of its height, rearward projection and proximity to the
shared boundary, would result in an unduly detrimental loss of outlook, overbearing impact and
unacceptable sense of enclosure to the adjoining property and their garden at No. 43 Larch Road,
to the detriment of the amenity of the occupants of this property. The proposal is therefore
contrary to policy DMP1 of Brent’s Local Plan (2019-2041), and the guidelines contained within
Supplementary Planning Document 2: Residential Extensions Design Guide (2018).
1
The proposed single storey side infill extension, by reason of its design, size and siting, would
appear as an overly prominent, dominant and incongruous addition, detrimental to the character
and appearance of the host property and surrounding area. As such, the proposal is contrary to
planning policy DMP1 & BD1 of Brent's Local Plan (2019-41) and the guidelines contained within
Supplementary Planning Document 2: Residential Extensions Design Guide (2018).
2
The proposed side infill extension, by reason of its height, rearward projection and proximity to the
shared boundary, would result in an unduly detrimental loss of outlook, overbearing impact and
unacceptable sense of enclosure to the adjoining property and their garden at No. 43 Larch Road,
to the detriment of the amenity of the occupants of this property. The proposal is therefore
contrary to policy DMP1 of Brent’s Local Plan (2019-2041), and the guidelines contained within
Supplementary Planning Document 2: Residential Extensions Design Guide (2018).
Policies cited
DMP1BD1
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.