Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentDollis Hill ward25/3240
Planning application · Brent

25/3240.

34 Vincent Gardens, London, NW2 7RP

Householder at 34 Vincent Gardens, London, NW2 7RP, received 20 Nov 2025 — refused on 26 Mar 2026 (delegated, Desmond Lam).

BrentDollis HillNW2 7RP25/3240
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Mar 2026
18 wks
Decision time
10 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
4
Objections
1 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of existing rear balcony and associated alterations; alterations to rooflights and rear door.

Reference
25/3240
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW2 7RP
Council
Received
20 Nov 2025
Validated
29 Jan 2026
Target date
26 Mar 2026
Decision date
26 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal lodged
Reference
25/3240
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW2 7RP
Council
Received
20 Nov 2025
Validated
29 Jan 2026
Target date
26 Mar 2026
Decision date
26 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal lodged
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal_statement_of_case_34_vincent_gardens
6 May 2026
Site map
26 Mar 2026
Original existing plans and elevations
26 Mar 2026
Approved plans 21/3648
26 Mar 2026
Existing/as built elevations
26 Mar 2026
Proposed elevations & axonometric view
26 Mar 2026
Proposed balcony construction and roof plan
26 Mar 2026
Location plan
26 Mar 2026
As bulit loft plan
26 Mar 2026
Final delegated report
26 Mar 2026
Appeal_statement_of_case_34_vincent_gardens
6 May 2026
Site map
26 Mar 2026
Original existing plans and elevations
26 Mar 2026
Show all 10 rows
Approved plans 21/3648
26 Mar 2026
Existing/as built elevations
26 Mar 2026
Proposed elevations & axonometric view
26 Mar 2026
Proposed balcony construction and roof plan
26 Mar 2026
Location plan
26 Mar 2026
As bulit loft plan
26 Mar 2026
Final delegated report
26 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Desmond Lam — 18 weeks from submission (10 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
20 Nov 2025
Application received
29 Jan 2026
Application validated
26 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
26 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Desmond Lam
20 Nov 2025
Application received
29 Jan 2026
Application validated
26 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Desmond Lam

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed balcony, by virtue of scale and design would materially harm the character of the house in terms of its incongruent design contrary to Policy DMP1 of Brent’s Local Plan 2019-2041 and the Residential Extensions & Alterations SPD (2025).
2
The proposed balcony, by virtue of scale and design would materially harm neighbouring amenity in terms of its positioning which overlooks neighbouring properties contrary to Policy DMP1 of Brent’s Local Plan 2019-2041 and the Residential Extensions & Alterations SPD (2025).
1
The proposed balcony, by virtue of scale and design would materially harm the character of the house in terms of its incongruent design contrary to Policy DMP1 of Brent’s Local Plan 2019-2041 and the Residential Extensions & Alterations SPD (2025).
2
The proposed balcony, by virtue of scale and design would materially harm neighbouring amenity in terms of its positioning which overlooks neighbouring properties contrary to Policy DMP1 of Brent’s Local Plan 2019-2041 and the Residential Extensions & Alterations SPD (2025).
Policies cited
DMP1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
4
In support
1
Total comments
5
Objections
4
In support
1
Total comments
5
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.