Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentCricklewood & Mapesbury wardNW2 4HA62 Dartmouth Road, London, NW2 4HA26/0127
Planning application · Brent

26/0127.

62 Dartmouth Road, London, NW2 4HA

Householder at 62 Dartmouth Road, London, NW2 4HA, received 20 Jan 2026 — refused on 30 Mar 2026 (delegated, Lauren Brown).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 Mar 2026
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed front extension to and conversion of existing rear garage into habitable space, alteration to garage front, side and rear fenestrations and raised side patio with railing to form balcony to dwellinghouse

Reference
26/0127
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
20 Jan 2026
Validated
2 Feb 2026
Target date
30 Mar 2026
Decision date
30 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/0127
Type
Householder
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
20 Jan 2026
Validated
2 Feb 2026
Target date
30 Mar 2026
Decision date
30 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Final delegated report
30 Mar 2026
Final decision notice
30 Mar 2026
Application form
20 Jan 2026
Final delegated report
30 Mar 2026
Final decision notice
30 Mar 2026
Application form
20 Jan 2026

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 30 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Lauren Brown — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
20 Jan 2026
Application received
2 Feb 2026
Application validated
30 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
30 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Lauren Brown
20 Jan 2026
Application received
2 Feb 2026
Application validated
30 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
30 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Lauren Brown

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed outbuilding is not considered incidental to the use of the main dwellinghouse and as such the nature and intensity of the use of the outbuilding, is considered to be out of keeping and character in this area of domestic rear gardens. The outbuilding is not considered to have an adequate layout for its likely use and would have an unacceptable impact on the overall living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers. This is contrary to Brent Local Plan policies DMP1 and BH12.
1
The proposed outbuilding is not considered incidental to the use of the main dwellinghouse and as such the nature and intensity of the use of the outbuilding, is considered to be out of keeping and character in this area of domestic rear gardens. The outbuilding is not considered to have an adequate layout for its likely use and would have an unacceptable impact on the overall living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers. This is contrary to Brent Local Plan policies DMP1 and BH12.

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.