Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentRoundwood ward26/0483
Planning application · Brent

26/0483.

12 Trojan Business Centre, Cobbold Road, London, NW10 9ST

Full / Other Planning at 12 Trojan Business Centre, Cobbold Road, London, NW10 9ST, received 25 Feb 2026 — refused on 21 Apr 2026 (delegated, Parag Dhanani).

BrentRoundwoodNW10 9ST26/0483
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 Apr 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use of mezzanine storage and extension to be used as ancillary offices, alteration to fenestration to front elevation, new windows, reinstating existing skylights and internal alterations

Reference
26/0483
Type
Full Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
NW10 9ST
Council
Received
25 Feb 2026
Target date
22 Apr 2026
Decision date
21 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/0483
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
NW10 9ST
Council
Received
25 Feb 2026
Target date
22 Apr 2026
Decision date
21 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Location plan
21 Apr 2026
Existing floor plans and elevations
21 Apr 2026
Proposed floor plans and elevations
21 Apr 2026
Final delegated report
21 Apr 2026
Final decision notice
21 Apr 2026
Design and access statement
11 Mar 2026
Application form
11 Mar 2026
Location plan
21 Apr 2026
Existing floor plans and elevations
21 Apr 2026
Proposed floor plans and elevations
21 Apr 2026
Show all 7 rows
Final delegated report
21 Apr 2026
Final decision notice
21 Apr 2026
Design and access statement
11 Mar 2026
Application form
11 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 21 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Parag Dhanani — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Feb 2026
Application received
22 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
21 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Parag Dhanani
25 Feb 2026
Application received
22 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
21 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Parag Dhanani

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extension of the mezzanine floor over the loading bay and the reduction in height of the vehicular access would result in the loss of an adequate on-site servicing area capable of accommodating 8metre rigid service vehicles. The development would therefore fail to provide safe and effective servicing arrangements and would necessitate servicing activity within circulation areas, to the detriment of pedestrian and vehicular safety and the efficient operation of the private estate. The proposal is consequently unacceptable and contrary to Policy BT3 of the Brent Local Plan (2019–2041). DocFDN Ref: 26/0483 Page 2 of 3
1
The proposed extension of the mezzanine floor over the loading bay and the reduction in height of the vehicular access would result in the loss of an adequate on-site servicing area capable of accommodating 8metre rigid service vehicles. The development would therefore fail to provide safe and effective servicing arrangements and would necessitate servicing activity within circulation areas, to the detriment of pedestrian and vehicular safety and the efficient operation of the private estate. The proposal is consequently unacceptable and contrary to Policy BT3 of the Brent Local Plan (2019–2041). DocFDN Ref: 26/0483 Page 2 of 3
Policies cited
BT3

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.