Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBrentNorthwick Park ward26/0822
Planning application · Brent

26/0822.

Street Record, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1

Licences & Notifications at Street Record, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1, received 30 Mar 2026 — refused on 22 May 2026 (delegated, Janseway Cheung).

BrentNorthwick Park26/0822
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 May 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
3
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Prior approval for proposed telecommunications installation comprising removal of 1no. existing 10-metre-high streetwork pole with 1no. existing trisector antenna and 1no. existing equipment cabinet to be replaced with 1no. new 20-metre-high phase 8 streetwork pole with wraparound cabinet to accommodate 3no. new antennas and 1no new trisector antenna with 1no. new equipment cabinet and associated ancillary development thereto on foot path outside 231 Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3TU

Reference
26/0822
Type
Telecom development
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
30 Mar 2026
Target date
24 May 2026
Decision date
22 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/0822
Type
Telecom development
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
30 Mar 2026
Target date
24 May 2026
Decision date
22 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Final delegated report
22 May 2026
Final decision notice
22 May 2026
5g and future technology
31 Mar 2026
Developers notice
31 Mar 2026
Declaration of conformity with international commission on n
31 Mar 2026
Planning statement
31 Mar 2026
Site specific supplementary information
31 Mar 2026
Connected growth manual digital infrastructure
31 Mar 2026
Iet guide to 5g
31 Mar 2026
All drawings
31 Mar 2026
Final delegated report
22 May 2026
Final decision notice
22 May 2026
5g and future technology
31 Mar 2026
Show all 10 rows
Developers notice
31 Mar 2026
Declaration of conformity with international commission on n
31 Mar 2026
Planning statement
31 Mar 2026
Site specific supplementary information
31 Mar 2026
Connected growth manual digital infrastructure
31 Mar 2026
Iet guide to 5g
31 Mar 2026
All drawings
31 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 22 May 2026, delegated decision by Janseway Cheung — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Mar 2026
Application received
24 May 2026
Statutory target date
22 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Janseway Cheung
30 Mar 2026
Application received
24 May 2026
Statutory target date
22 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Janseway Cheung

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed telecommunications equipment, by virtue of its design, siting and excessive height, would result in a visually incongruous and overly dominant form of development, detrimental to the visual amenities, character and appearance of the streetscene and Sudbury Court Conservation Area. It would also have an unacceptable impact on highway safety. Prior Approval is therefore required and refused having regard to Part 16 of the Town and Country (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, as amended.
1
The proposed telecommunications equipment, by virtue of its design, siting and excessive height, would result in a visually incongruous and overly dominant form of development, detrimental to the visual amenities, character and appearance of the streetscene and Sudbury Court Conservation Area. It would also have an unacceptable impact on highway safety. Prior Approval is therefore required and refused having regard to Part 16 of the Town and Country (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, as amended.

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.