Planning Atlas
Planning application · Brent

96/0433.

Universal Aerial Platforms, Drury Way , Neasden NW10 0JH

Full / Other Planning at Universal Aerial Platforms, Drury Way , Neasden NW10 0JH, received 13 Mar 1996 — approved on 23 Apr 1996 (delegated, Jerome Frost - DO NOT USE - Left Brent).

BrentNW10 0JH96/0433
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Approved
Outcome
23 Apr 1996
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of single storey front extension.

Reference
96/0433
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Postcode
NW10 0JH
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
13 Mar 1996
Target date
8 May 1996
Decision date
23 Apr 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
96/0433
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Postcode
NW10 0JH
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
13 Mar 1996
Target date
8 May 1996
Decision date
23 Apr 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 23 Apr 1996, delegated decision by Jerome Frost - DO NOT USE - Left Brent — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Mar 1996
Application received
8 May 1996
Statutory target date
23 Apr 1996
Delegated decision: Approved · Jerome Frost - DO NOT USE - Left Brent
13 Mar 1996
Application received
8 May 1996
Statutory target date
23 Apr 1996
Delegated decision: Approved · Jerome Frost - DO NOT USE - Left Brent

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.