Planning Atlas
Planning application · Brent

98/1630.

Southern Fried Chicken House, 108 Craven Park Road, Harlesden, NW10 8QD

Full / Other Planning at Southern Fried Chicken House, 108 Craven Park Road, Harlesden, NW10 8QD, received 11 Aug 1998 — refused on 14 Dec 1998 (delegated, Kate Mansell).

BrentNW10 8QD98/1630
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBrent profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Dec 1998
18 wks
Decision time
10 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
3
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Brent planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of 2-storey rear extension to create storage and offices

Reference
98/1630
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW10 8QD
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
11 Aug 1998
Validated
11 Sep 1998
Target date
9 Nov 1998
Decision date
14 Dec 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
98/1630
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW10 8QD
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
11 Aug 1998
Validated
11 Sep 1998
Target date
9 Nov 1998
Decision date
14 Dec 1998
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Brent portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 14 Dec 1998, delegated decision by Kate Mansell — 18 weeks from submission (10 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Aug 1998
Application received
11 Sep 1998
Application validated
9 Nov 1998
Statutory target date
14 Dec 1998
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Mansell
11 Aug 1998
Application received
11 Sep 1998
Application validated
9 Nov 1998
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Dec 1998
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Mansell

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.